Members of the House committee that investigated the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol have warned America for three years to take former President Donald Trump at his word.

Now, as Trump is poised to win the Republican presidential nomination, his criminal trials face delays that could stall them past Election Day, and his rhetoric grows increasingly authoritarian, some of those lawmakers find themselves following their own advice.

In mid-March, Trump said on social media that the committee members should be jailed. In December he vowed to be a dictator on “day one.” In August, he said he would “have no choice” but to lock up his political opponents.

“If he intends to eliminate our constitutional system and start arresting his political enemies, I guess I would be on that list,” said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose). “One thing I did learn on the committee is to pay attention and listen to what Trump says, because he means it.”

Lofgren added that she doesn’t yet have a plan in place to thwart potential retribution by Trump. But Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), who has long been a burr in Trump’s side, said he’s having “real-time conversations” with his staff about how to make sure he stays safe if Trump follows through on his threats.

“We’re taking this seriously, because we have to,” Schiff said. “We’ve seen this movie before … and how perilous it is to ignore what someone is saying when they say they want to be a dictator.”

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      They are obviously different but they are an illustrations of two different ideologies and how one was much more severely prosecuted. But I agree, lets do apples to apples, how many people were arrested and convicted on the May 29th attack on the capital by the leftists?

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Moving the goalposts much?

        That event was way different that Jan 6. On Jan 6, we had armed people in the Capitol building threatening to hang the VP. On May 29, we had some people cross a barricade. They’re not comparable at all.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          So you are going with the “BUT INSURRECTION!!!” argument. It was not a insurrection, and you have yet to compare the quantities of people arrested and convicted with the different events.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            If you want to compare quantities, go ahead, but that’s not on me to do. I did that already with your other stated comparison, and I’m not going to keep doing that with your whataboutism.

            And I do believe it was an insurrection. They were literally demanding the election be overturned, and the charges and confessions were consistent with that.

            If it wasn’t an insurrection, what exactly was it? The burden of proof lies with you.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              It was obviously a riot, and I am sad that you can see through some of the narrative but then get caught up on this one. How is it possible that you do not recognize this as a targeted prosecution for political reasons?

              • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                An insurrection can be a riot also, it was a riot formed with the intention of disturbing the electoral process (aka insurrection), how is that not obvious to you? They were extremely open about it, in the lead up to and during it. They live streamed the entire thing. Looking up the definition of ‘insurrection’, at a basic level it means an armed rebellion. Many people were armed.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  They were not armed… I am doing the insurrection debate, the only reason you guys believe this was because the media kept telling you it was. Literally, its just propaganda, and it has been extremely effective on you guys.

                  • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I’m not going to bother doing your research for you, you can look up how many people were convicted with gun charges. THE MEDIA DIDN’T TELL ME dude the people doing it said it themselves while they were doing it! IF you support them, why aren’t you proud that they tried to fix the corrupt government?

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Because of how Trump responded in both scenarios. On Jan 6, he provided no additional support to capitol police, despite being urged to do so, but on May 29, the Secret Service pepper sprayed protesters, various policing units were brought in, and troops and National Guard were deployed.

                The response was so different between the two events that it’s clear Trump was okay with Jan 6 (they were trying to keep him in power) but not okay with May 29 (they were opposing inaction on police reform). On Jan 6, multiple people died, and many more were hospitalized. On May 29, the were a few hospitalizations among police, but nothing life threatening. If Trump responded similarly to both, I’d be more sympathetic, but his active lack of action doesn’t instill trust.

                I’d like to see the various lawsuits resolved quickly, because it’s getting to be a very political issue. Ideally, he would’ve resolved everything years ago, but he continually delayed and now we’re in a massive mess. That said, I don’t see him as a victim here, this is exactly the expected result for his actions. Whether he’s guilty should be determined by the courts though, not public opinion.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  You are just repeating the media lines. If you have any doubts then look into the stories better and see the obvious double standard. Just take one second to look at the steve baker prosecution.

                  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Or you can provide evidence…

                    For Steve Baker, it looks pretty open and shut:

                    “The only thing I regret is that I didn’t like steal their computers because God knows what I could’ve found on their computers if I’d done that. But by the time I got into Pelosi’s office, unfortunately there was some damage done,” Baker said, according to the FBI.

                    So, not only did he essentially admit to the charges, but he showed intent to break other federal laws.

                    Maybe he was paraded about a bit to “make an example” of him, idk, I would need to review video footage to decide if it seemed excessive. However, journalists don’t get additional protections and can’t just break federal laws whenever they want to get a scoop and expect no charges.

                    So I honestly don’t see a double standard here, what I see is you potentially buying into conspiracy BS.

                    And here’s another article in case you don’t like the AP or whatever. As a libertarian myself, I don’t want to be associated with this idiot. If he thinks Trump is in any way libertarian, then he’s mistaken about what to label himself. A self-respecting libertarian wouldn’t trespass on federal property in an attempt to overthrow a democratic election, that’s a clear violation of the NAP and I reject that nonsense. I’m no fan of Biden, but that doesn’t mean I want to overthrow an election to put another piece of crap in office. I very much dislike both Biden and Trump and plan to not vote for either this election.

          • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Were you at any protests in 2020? Many people are still in prison. The police were absolutely unhinged and caused massive injuries and trauma to protesters and non-involved people. One protester who shot someone in self defense, a right-wing man trying to kill protesters, was later assassinated by federal marshals. The entire neighborhood I lived in was blanketed with tear gas, filling up residents homes.