• tetraodon@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah. The Germans and the Japanese had a sense of State, of common history someone could build upon.

    The Afghani have nothing of the sort. Their politics is nothing more than a bunch of warring tribes.

    And Russia is a nuclear power. Nobody is going to touch them with a ten-foot pole, certainly not in the way Germany and Japan were rebuilt post-WWII.

    • Parahsalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Germany could pretty accurately be described as “Warring Tribes” until Bismark unified Germany in 1870. Doesn’t take that long for these things to change.

      • tetraodon@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You got to be kidding me. Do you even have an idea of Germany’s pre-modern and modem history?

        Germany’s “warring states” (mind you: states, not tribes) produced Charlemagne and a streak of European emperors, as well as a hundreds of artists, scientists, and philosophers including Goethe, Hegel, and Kant. It was one of the first countries to be reached by the Enlightenment.

        Italy could also be described as “warring states” during the Renaissance.

        What has Afghanistan produced when women aren’t even allowed to complete secondary education?

      • tetraodon@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        And how do you plan on educating the Afghani while the Taliban rule?

        Japan and Germany were invaded, their leaders brought to justice, their government dismantled and rebuilt. Nobody has an appetite for that in Afghanistan.

        The Afghani had a chance. They had a democratic government and elections during the American occupation, but they threw it away and allowed the Taliban to grab power without lifting a finger to oppose them.

        There’s not much else we can do from the West apart from taking in the refugees who will make an effort to integrate in our society.

        • DONTBANTHISACCOUNT@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          LMAO 🤣 US occupation wasn’t about rebuilding them; if that’s what You believe

          Anyways, judging them or any other war torn nation is equivalent of judging homeless people and people who are mentally ill ; " it’s their fault, was their choice"
          It’s pathetic to say the least

          Today’s US isn’t the same US that existed during WWll btw… The country has changed drastically

          Kek

          • tetraodon@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No matter what the US occupation was about. It kicked out the Taliban. They had a democratic government and elections. Not perfect, by a long shot, but way better than what they ended up with.

            Afghanistan isn’t the only country that has suffered through war. Japan and the whole of Europe were pretty war torn after WWI and WWII. South Korea was totally fucked up after the Korean war. Vietnam went from war to war between the 60s and the 80s (vs. France, the US, China).

            And yet none of these countries are as fucked up and stuck in the middle ages as Afghanistan. Why?

            I’m not judging, but it is undeniable that it was their choice as a people to welcome the Taliban with open arms instead of resisting, as e.g. the Ukrainians are doing (and against a much stronger, organized opponent).

            Sorry, but if an alcoholic decides to keep drinking instead of seeking help, yes, it is their fault and their choice.

    • YaaAsantewaa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Japan didn’t have anything pre-WW1, it’s literally why in WW2 they had to invade China, there weren’t enough resources in Japan to establish an industrial base for their empire.

      And Germany wasn’t even unified until what, the 1870’s? Germany is technically a younger country than the U.S, same with Italy, it’s pure revisionism to say that European countries were ever united because they weren’t until WW1 when Ultra-Nationalism became the name of the game in geopolitics.

      I think you people are just legitimately uninformed about world history. The Afghans have the same thing going on for them, but Russia screwed it all up and created their divisions when they invaded