• StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    A lot of what fans think is canon just isn’t anyway. Most so-called ‘violations’ are just different interpretations of what was shown on screen decades ago.

    There’s an entire list out there of all the headcanon that fans hold up that just isn’t supported by what’s on screen.

    Writers shouldn’t be held to fan interpretations of what they thought they saw in TOS or TNG.

    In other words, fans who clearly live in glass canon houses shouldn’t throw stones.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      TOS and TNG aren’t even consistent in their own shows. Gene just wrote whatever sriry he wanted to tell and ran with it.

      • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well there’s that too.

        Gene found it totally cool for previously unmentioned immediate family to show up out of the blue, but fans can’t help going into spasms when things not previously mentioned show up.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I remember reading a rant on reddit (or something, maybe it was one of those TV Show fact sites) about people who were convinced there was some throwaway line in Voyager that implied you needed matter tanks to store matter for replication.

      Turns out the line they were talking about had to do with the matter/anti-matter tanks for the warp drive.

      Sometimes fans are just dumb and completely reinterpret canon as whatever they want it to be anyways.