• zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    PHEVs have their own disadvantages, though.

    They’re a lot more complicated with higher maintenance costs, and also often don’t have an EV drivetrain that’s fully independent. They’ll kick on the engine when accelerating, going uphill, for cabin heating, etc. Most of them don’t just use the engine as a range extender.

    PHEVs only make sense so long as batteries continue to be expensive. The complexity of manufacturing the dual drivetrain and plummeting battery prices is going to see PHEVs become more expensive than gas cars or long range battery EVs in another year or two.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Those are all serious concerns, and I expect PHEV vehicle design to change over the next few years (my only concern is how many “few” is).

      The more sensible design if you’re are going for ‘ICE as backup’, not ‘electric as efficiency improvement on top of ICE’ is a typical electric ‘drivetrain’ and battery, with a generator, more similar to diesel-electric trains. A switch to diesel in general wouldn’t be a bad idea either, but the north american would be resistant.

      Depending on how gas proces and the EV market go, I wouldn’t be surprised if drop-in engine replacements for converting ICE vehicles to hybrid become easily available in the next 5-10 years either, especially on larger vehicles