• phar@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I would choose Manjaro over Ubuntu any day…canonical is garbage

  • Kess8a@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I know linux is likely the better option here, but for me I have two word…

    Winaero Tweaker

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I keep seeing headlines like this all the time. I’m over here like “This has already been a thing for years”. Whenever I’d setup a win10 pc for someone, I’d have to clean the ads out of the start menu as part of the setup. So I ask again, how is this any different from the bullshit we’re already dealing with?

  • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If Microsoft does that I’m wiping out my laptop and going back to Linux*

    * only reason I moved away is I bought a new laptop to replace my 2010 Mac mini that ran LinuxMint, and the laptop came preloaded with Windows 11 and I decided to just keep using it as-is as I liked the UI.

    Fun fact: it is not an entirely new idea. Microsoft did something similar with Active Desktop in Windows 98 but was later removed.

  • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    So Microsoft is one of the most valuable companies in the entire world. They have a stranglehold on corporate America, power a huge the cloud infrastructure, hold one of the largest sources of telemetry/user data, and are the defacto standard of PC environments worldwide.

    Why in the fuck do they need to pivot to ads? I’m genuinely curious. Even if they lost 50% of their entire business they would still be one of the most profitable companies in the world.

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        the shareholders don’t get that. the top managers, CEOs etc. get it. some of them may be shareholders as well, but that’s not how they fill their pockets.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Would be nice if pivoting to ads caused them to lose 50% of their business.

      Sadly it won’t.

      • accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yea but like, their competitors, when it comes to operating systems are Apple, which isn’t anywhere near small enough to be obtainable by anyone and Linux and Linux-Derivatives, which are also unobtainable due to their open source nature.

        • FoolishOwl@social.coop
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          @accideath The point isn’t whether Microsoft will reach that end. The point is that like all capitalist enterprises it will forever strive to do so.

              • accideath@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Not every larger company is automatically evil, just because they exist within a capitalist market. A lot of them are, sure. At least to some extent. But there still are privately owned enterprises that do have a conscience.

                Also, calling them “capitalist” enterprises seems redundant.

                • FoolishOwl@social.coop
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  @accideath I’m calling them capitalist enterprises to emphasize that they are capitalist enterprises. They accumulate capital. That is what they are and defines what they do.

                  A capitalist enterprise does not decide it has enough and can retire and take up gardening. It is not a person. It does not have a conscience.

    • rish@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Isn’t it obvious? Start Menu is being used by every windows user but is not generating any revenue Serving ads will enable them to better support the platform and provide more advanced features. Ad supported version is better than making it a subscription like some third party apps have done. Start8 I think, basic copy of Microsoft’s Start Menu but paid.

    • jasep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because when you have shareholders, there’s no such thing as “we’re profitable enough”. Shareholders always demand more. Ads means more profit, at least in the short term. Next quarter profits are all that matter to public companies.

      It’s obscene, but it’s the way it is.

      • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s not just that they demand more, they demand more/faster growth all the time. It doesn’t matter that the economy has slowed down to borderline recession, it doesn’t matter that they pretty much captured all the market they can, they still need to make more and more money every quarter otherwise they’re considered a failure even if they are one of the biggest companies in the world.

    • Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think it’s the same reason games offer a cash shop for things you can get in-game. Sure they’re making billions but why not billions plus ad revenue? I don’t agree with the practice but the answer always comes back to money.

    • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, lol people forgot what ads are. News feeds, Xbox and other office apps you haven’t bought yet, are also ads, just their own products.

      • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’m under no illusion Ubuntu is perfect. But I PAID for my Windows licenses. And if I paid, I don’t want to see ads. I don’t care about Win 8’s penetrative pricing model or the $25 coupon. I don’t care that I paid for my licenses 10+ years ago. Don’t sell me ads on a product I paid for. And Windows serves up ads all the god damned time now. If there’s anything good to be said about Windows 8, it’s that it didn’t take every opportunity to sell me an Office 365 subscription ever second breath I took. I don’t actually remember the last time I saw an ad in Ubuntu, and I’ve been using it to varying degrees since 2011. I think we can at least agree Canonical is better than Microsoft, yeah?

        All that said, I’ve had thoughts of switching to plain old Debian, especially now that I’d consider myself much more experienced and comfortable in Linux. But if I were recommending a distro to a new user, I am one million percent telling them Ubuntu or Mint, depending on how they feel about the Windows UI.

  • Dagamant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve used Linux on every PC except my gaming PC for years. This year I made the final leap because of decisions like this from Microsoft.

    Very few games have failed to work, the ones that have are all from Epic and they fail because of their shitty anticheat software. The only other things I feel the lack of are paint.net and the Affinity apps.

    • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      EAC is now largely compatible with Linux, but devs have to enable support per game.

      I recommend browsing protondb to see how (if) people have made games with anticheat work, you might need to change proton versions, add launch options etc.

      • Dagamant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        5 in use. Main Gaming PC, Laptop, Game server pc, media server PC, and another for testing things out. Whenever a family member upgrades I get the old one so most of these are pretty old.

        I have gimp and other graphics tools, I also have a LOT of hours of use in the ones I mentioned so there are things I know how to do quickly in those programs but not in their counterparts.

      • Dagamant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have Pinta, it’s ok but lacks a lot of the plugins I used and hasn’t been too stable. The graphics editing thing is something that will,just take time for me to rework my workflows. Gimp is great, I’m just not used to it.