• Pipoca@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most other voting systems would actually have elected Begich.

    He was the Condorcet winner; voters preferred him over Palin and voters preferred him over Peltola.

    • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a stretch, and you’re likely assuming that all Palin voters would vote for Begich. Again Peltola already had 48.8% in round 1 and wasn’t the incumbent.

      I also don’t think weaker wide appeal (beyond majority) is the best way, as that seems like a potential race to a position-less (or simply inoffensive but ineffective) candidate. Though in this case it seems close, at least if it’s red vs blue moderates.

      Also sure, if Palin voters would’ve voted strategically their side might’ve won. I’m not sure if it’s because they fell for the trappings of FPtP, because they were unwilling to vote for a moderate and thus bet on the wrong candidate etc. But voting for the non-incumbent as their first vote would’ve been safer as it’d allow them to still be a Palin voter if Begich lost in round 1 as he did. I don’t think the situation is terrible, as under FPtP the only strategy would be for Begich voters to vote for Palin (full stop) which clearly they didn’t even want to do as their second choice.