• jorp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    both games have dozens of hours of content and expand upon the original game significantly, this is such an entitled gamer thing to say

    • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not paying $70 for a single game, much less multiple $70 installments. If you want to choke on what they give you, be my guest, but I’ll pass.

      • n1ckn4m3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        “A single game” is somewhat of a misnomer. The original FF7 took about 40 hours to play from start to finish, and about 80 hours if you wanted to really 100% everything. FF7 Remake took about 40 hours to play from start to finish, and about 80 hours if you want to really 100% everything.

        Is the root of your concern that you’re paying too much for too little gameplay? Considering rebirth takes about 50-60 hours to beat and ~80-100 hours to 100%, I don’t understand the criticism.

        If the answer is that you expected over 100 hours of base gameplay for $70, the problem isn’t with Square-Enix, imo. That’s before taking however long the 3rd game takes to beat into account, as well (which according to the devs is going to be at minimum the same length as rebirth – bringing it to over 150 hours of base gameplay for the trilogy.) I think expecting 150 hours of base gameplay in a single purchase for a story-driven JRPG is unrealistic.

        Flip side, the joy of these games eventually coming out on PC means if you wait long enough, you’ll be able to get all 3 and DLC for like $50 total, so there are options for everyone.

          • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            To be fair, BG3 is very much the exception. It’s a fantastic exception that others could learn from, but an exception nonetheless.

            • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              To be fair, it’s the new standard for me. Full price? Better not be MTX and needs 100h+.

              • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’m with you on that front. I almost never pay full price for games and loathe microtransactions.

      • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not a single game. It’s a whole new piece of software. They decided to make three games on the same Engine to streamline production but it’s not an hd remaster of an old game. They are brand new games.

        I can understand the perception that it should be one game because it’s the story from an old game that has been split up. However if you play it, you’ll find out pretty quickly it’s actually a whole new story.

        There are plenty of cash grab titles out there but I don’t think this is the cash grab I think you make it out to be.

        • jorp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Peter Jackson is a piece of shit for filming the entire LOTR trilogy at once but releasing it as 3 movies I think it’s absurd there was only one book