• toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    If it’s all encrypted & they don’t have the DNS requests, all they can see is that you sent X bytes to some IP which isn’t very helpful. Who’s to say these VPNs aren’t selling their data back to the ISPs anyhow?

    • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Encryption doesn’t mean perfectly hidden. Metadata isn’t encrypted for HTTPS iirc. And the ISP knows who your sending traffic to since they are routing you there and are usually your DNS. When connected to a good and trusted VPN, all that is hidden, your DNS can’t give away your location, and the only server you contact is the VPN

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        What metadata? The headers are as encrypted as the payload. That there was a key exchange between you & a server isn’t too useful.

        “Usually” is a strong word for DNS as well since all OSs let you change it & the megacorporations like Google & Cloudflare have already compelled a lot of folks to use their DNS ta resolve faster since the ISP ones are slow (& the smarter, curious folks used that as a launching point to find other provider or self-host). Some platforms have even been shipping DNS-over-HTTPS to get around some of these issues (since the payload & headers are encrypted under TLS).

        • hatedbad@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          the hostname of a website is explicitly not encrypted when using TLS. the Encrypted Client Hello extension fixes this but requires DNS over HTTPS and is still relatively new.

        • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It doesn’t matter if they are encrypted if you can sell the data about what the user is doing (eg if your connecting to a shopping website your probably shopping their). Better to obfuscate the source by choosing an endpoint that isn’t geographically related and associated with your identity. I only would ever recommend using a VPN that is open source and well audited by a renowned 3rd party auditor(s). https://luxsci.com/blog/what-is-really-protected-by-ssl-and-tls.html

        • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Usually means in 99.9% of typical configurations unless you are a techy or an enterprise.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        By who? Who is auditing the auditors? That’s not to say audits aren’t good, but when the code is proprietary, a lot of trust is required. I would prefer banking on solid, open tech which the TLS standard is. There is still use cases for VPNs, but outside like streaming piracy, you might be better served by the Tor network.

        • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yeah, I don’t trust proprietary server backend. Also I2P is a good option that should be less slow under the traffic of thousands of users.