db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 4 months agoOh no, Anarchists!slrpnk.netimagemessage-square284fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageOh no, Anarchists!slrpnk.netdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square284fedilink
minus-squareRedDoozer@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoActually, there seems to be a bit of a mix-up. Let me clarify. In an anarchist group, enforcing anything goes against its fundamental principles. If personal gain is the motive, one isn’t truly aligned with the group’s social contract and isn’t considered part of it. Decisions are made collectively, without hierarchy. Voting or delegating organisational tasks to sub-groups is the norm. I won’t go into words like “attacking,” “defense,” or “threats” as they are military terms, far from the anarchist ethos. And I won’t call you “bro” or make you read theory. I feel you won’t.
minus-squareFiniteBanjo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoSo then Anarchy is completely defenseless to both internal and external strife, doomed to collapse in every circumstance.
minus-squareRedDoozer@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoWhy defenseless? The entire organization can defense itself from outsiders. No need of hierarchy for that.
minus-squareChuymatt@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoJust one gifted sociopath dooms it from the inside… I long for mutual aid society, but every time I have participated in any form of it, I’ve had to back away as it invariably becomes toxic. I just don’t have the energy to keep fighting, honestly.
Actually, there seems to be a bit of a mix-up. Let me clarify.
In an anarchist group, enforcing anything goes against its fundamental principles.
If personal gain is the motive, one isn’t truly aligned with the group’s social contract and isn’t considered part of it.
Decisions are made collectively, without hierarchy. Voting or delegating organisational tasks to sub-groups is the norm.
I won’t go into words like “attacking,” “defense,” or “threats” as they are military terms, far from the anarchist ethos.
And I won’t call you “bro” or make you read theory. I feel you won’t.
So then Anarchy is completely defenseless to both internal and external strife, doomed to collapse in every circumstance.
Why defenseless? The entire organization can defense itself from outsiders. No need of hierarchy for that.
Just one gifted sociopath dooms it from the inside…
I long for mutual aid society, but every time I have participated in any form of it, I’ve had to back away as it invariably becomes toxic. I just don’t have the energy to keep fighting, honestly.