• Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I assume 6.22 is still in production, and might be that even someone is paying Microsoft for support.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well, the two relevant questions there are: A) is it?, and B) so what?

          It’s not like you’re not allowed to provide paid support for a piece of open source software.

          At this point I’m not sure what portion of the difference between 4 and 6.22 is relevant or unknown. That’s a pretty well explored platform. I guess this way FreeDOS stays relevant a bit longer? Maybe? It’s not like it isn’t trivial to pull a copy of 6.22. It was trivial when it was new.

          • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            If 6.22 is used in military/banking/insurance/energy/heathcare system deep in the critical infrastructure, you don’t want attackers finding weakness in OS that is not patchable.

      • Voyajer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Why wouldn’t you? Why not a later version, or every version? Wouldn’t you like to know the reasoning behind the decision for doing this with MS-DOS 4 specifically? It seems like they’re going through approximately each major revision but is that going to stop at 6.22 or will MS start releasing windows with win 1.0?