• The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I can’t see a way to frankly assess the quality of a game on its commercial success, but let’s say least not pretend the franchise’s popularity is based on its later installments - that puts the cart before the horse imo.

    Interplay going bankrupt is the reason Bethesda owns this IP. FO3 wasn’t a bad game, but it started development before their involvement. Everything Bethesda made on its own has been increasingly in their own simulationist, environmental style, which can be fun but isn’t a good fit for the highly novelistic style that made it popular to begin with.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think my view still stands, without bathesda that series would have ended with that weird ass “fallout: bos” for PS2. If it hadn’t been bought by bathesda, we would have no fallout 3, 4 or even NV. Cause as much as people claim it isn’t, NV uses the bones and parameters of fo3, just builds on it. We also wouldn’t have gotten the show, which was great

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You imagine Bethesda was the sole bidder on the IP, but this isn’t the case. But for their shrewdness, the series would have survived just fine.

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Do you have some insider knowledge about other companies that bid on the rights or?

          From what I can find online, there’s not much out there aside from Activision, which… Lmao