• mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Technically 6E is the best in-use version for compatible devices. Same as WiFi 6 but adds the 6GHz spectrum that was recently unlocked by many regulatory agencies around the world. The 6GHz range is significantly less congested and would have better real-world performance in dense residential areas.

    • Paradox@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      6E is great, but basically nothing supports it. I got a 6E capable AP from Ubiquiti, and looking at my devices table, nothing has ever used the 6GHz radio. My house has a wide variety of devices, many new

    • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I was looking into routers 6E had just come out, and from everything I could find that extra spectrum was only being used as a backhaul for mesh networks. A moot point for single node networks or those with a wired backhaul, which was generally still recommended by everything I read.

      • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        WiFi in its current form will never be better than ethernet for backhaul applications as it is half-duplex. The benefits of the new spectrum are wider bands which makes the real-world speeds closer to the published speeds. Congested frequencies mean the bands must be more narrow, which lowers real-world bandwidth.