-IGN 8 / 10

-PC Gamer 77 / 100

-GamesRadar +3.5 / 5

-TheSixthAxis 7 / 10

-Shacknews 9 / 10

-GamingTrend 100 / 100

-Wccftech 8.5 / 10

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The signature is a great idea. This should become more popular where people attach licenses to their content. Lemmy would then make it optional to display the content license.

    These are just growing pains of a evolving ecosystem. But net net all of these additions are good

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      To be clear, I’m not objecting to applying a license to content.

      I’m objecting to shoving a license in everyone’s face that’s bigger than the actual content.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        To be clear, I’m not objecting to applying a license to content.

        I’m objecting to shoving a license in everyone’s face that’s bigger than the actual content.

        Originally, I had to just regular font size, but someone was complaining about that, so I shrunk the font, to be less conspicuous.

        Then I just had the Creative Commons license number, with no description, but then someone was complaining about not knowing what that was.

        So then I changed it to just be a description of what it is, with no license number, but then someone was complaining about that.

        So now, I have both the description and the license number in there, in a smaller font, but somebody’s still complaining about that.

        If it bothers you that much, Feel. Free. To. Block. Me.

        Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)