• NoraV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The abuse of the block feature is a problem yes, I too was a victim of “you’re wrong I’m right shut up blocked”.

      But blocking can be useful too: if you disgrace someone and their posts? you can block them, someone is arrasing you? you can block them. (Arrassing post/comments wise, on private messages block will remain)

      An issue can be fix by not removing the feature itself, like reporting miss information.

      Regarding of the mute, is not exactly the same: if I mute someone, that someone can still comment under my posts, wich is the main reson I used to use the block, for not having imbeciles who thinks I’m an alien in the comment section.

      I think the way twitter block used to work was a sword with two blades, useful in many cases but easily abusible.

      • mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But blocking can be useful too: if you disgrace someone and their posts? you can block them, someone is arrasing you? you can block them. (Arrassing post/comments wise, on private messages block will remain)

        That’s still a feature. You can mute someone, and you won’t see anything they post anymore. You just can’t prevent them from making a post others can see.

        Regarding of the mute, is not exactly the same: if I mute someone, that someone can still comment under my posts, wich is the main reson I used to use the block, for not having imbeciles who thinks I’m an alien in the comment section.

        Why does it matter if you can’t even read it?

        Blocks take real value away by censoring people who might otherwise add important context or citations. Muting the obnoxious, rude people allows you to go on as if they were blocked.