And then people will really wonder why I hate white Amerikans. “Invade this, bomb that, nuke the third”, constantly slavering over the next genocide, and they wonder why ‘cracker’ is the nicest I’ve got for them.
Nice stereotype you have there. I’ll remind you that even Obama is a war criminal. The problem is America, not some white propensity.
Shut up, cracker; Obama’s half-white, only identifies with his Blackness when it’s convenient to the party(on some Aubrey Graham timing, no Drizzy), and never even considered putting in the work to killing the white man in his head. How else do you think he was allowed to take the presidency? If he was actually Black in heart and culture, he’d have never been allowed within spitting distance.
“No true scotsman…” I get it. So you define white/black in your mind based on someone’s culture and politics. Kind of contentious to say the least. Pretty convenient for you that you get to call everyone you disagree with “cracker” though.
It would be arguing semantics to say “half-white” is problematic when by the usual definition half-POC is still POC. So I’ll refrain.
It would be arguing semantics to say “half-white” is problematic when by the usual definition half-POC is still POC. So I’ll refrain.
Then clearly you’re not in the culture; 'cause we don’t claim anybody who bears the cracker’s water. Like what you’re doing right now. I’m sorry, would you rather I called you a minstrel like Obama continues to be instead?
I’ve never been called a minstrel before; go on.
Now that you’ve explained your unusually flexible view on race in the neighbouring thread, I think what you’re saying is that “colonialist yahoos will continue to exist widespread even after the fall,” and here we agree.
I expect you’ll continue to find that people bicker with you when you go outside of your bubble because you refer to commonly understood concepts in abrasively inscrutable ways.
post hog, peckerwood
Ramble on, honky.
Senator Graham has always been a pro war, pro bombing, neo conservative.
Yes, he’s an American politician?
I hate news about news. Here is the actual news: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=CWRboGsn-oA
How is it even legal to call for the murder of so many people using one of the most atrocious weapons humanity has invented…but if one were to suggest to apply a guillotine to this person for doing so, they would be in severe legal trouble?
Same way you can say guillotine the rich but not kill Jeffy Bezos
One is seen as more direct, even though the other includes more people
You can suggest he deserves a lot of things - like you can a pedo. What you can’t do is say you’re going to do it yourself.
I’m shocked! Who could have guessed this slimy invertebrate would have zero regard for anyone but himself!?
It’s wild that if anyone were to suggest killing Lindsey Graham they would probably be arrested and called a terrorist. But he can just casually advocate for nuking a densely populated area that is inhabited mostly by civilians and a bunch of brain dead morons will still vote for him.
Indifference to human life totally on brand for the gop
This is not indifference. This is a call for genocide. And a genocide at Ausschwitz proportions.
I’m saying lindsey graham doesn’t care if people live or if people die.
Imagine how much better the world would be if there was just a simple process of psychological screening for would-be politicians, and psychopaths were barred from holding office.
Better screen for sociopaths too.
There should also be a limit on how stupid they’re allowed to be.
At this rate we’d have no politicians!
Sure sounds better than what we currently have
Smart people put political proxies in power so they can get on with living their life.
There are only two reasons to become a politician and STAY a politician, and Graham is no Sanders.
Colonel Sanders, maybe…
There is already, it’s the electoral process. But it selects for these people to hold office rather than bars them. It bars normal people.
When I’m in a bullshitting competition and my opponents are Lindsey Graham and Dmitrey Medvedev
Like-minded country we need to forge close ties with 🙄
Let’s drop Lindsey Graham on Gaza instead of a nuke.
Haven’t Palestinians been through enough? You’d make them clean up Lyndsey Graham, too?
Cannabalism is against Islam, otherwise I’d say that at least they’d finally get some food in Gaza.
Good thing Lindsey is pork…oh wait…
Although, technically, even pork is allowed when the alternative is death by starvation.
Whether one would rather die than eat Graham Cracker is another thing.
So were the guillotines, for guys like Graham and all his buddies.
Nuke him
Sure would be a shame if something unfortunate happened to him first.
Nuking anything is never the right decision unless you’re heating up some leftovers. There is no such thing as a justified mass destruction weapon.
That’s not true. Terraforming Mars with nukes could be pretty cool, too.
What would that accomplish other than blowing the dust around?
It’ll maybe make Mars inhabitable eventually™. It’d be really cool to watch, though.
Edit: reference to shitpost (2011, before Elon could take credit for it)
Achieve disarmament by launching all nuclear weapons on Earth to detonate on mars. Then wait a few thousand years for radiation to dissipate.
Casually arguing for breaking the taboo on using nuclear weapons.
Forget Gaza, this is how human civilization ends.
We have been saying that Israel is a moral and legal hazard to the entire world as it rallied its allies to throw out all resemblance of a rule based international order recognizing such basic human rights like not being slaughtered and having access to basic food, water and medicine.
Removed by mod
So is Turkey.
But the guilt for colonialism and belligerent Christianity apparently lies so heavy on Westerners, that they are ready to absolve it with the blood of Christians never involved in those.
It’s an especially disgusting kind of virtue signalling to combine being against Israel, but for Turkey and Azerbaijan.
What are you talking about? Israel and Azerbaijan are allies. Azerbaijan sells its oil and gas to Israel and Israel granted it the “right” to exploit the gas fields in front of Gaza they want to steal. Israel supplied Azerbaijan with drones so it can slaughter Armenians.
And Turkey did not put the UN Charta through a shredder or demanded the world to attack UN institutions. Also Turkey does not demand its allies to cheer it on for its crimes.
I know they are allied, Israel and Turkey are not really that hostile between themselves too.
It’s about how optics of all this work on general Western audiences.
I agree Turkey relies less on such corruption. Azerbaijan is pretty similar to Israel in that regard, though. They just don’t need loud approval when silent approval does the job.
