ABCnews

  • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, definitely, the problem with that, as we’re seeing with the Supreme Court, it’s the people in power who are deciding the rules.

    Now we could make a change with some form of anti-corruption constitutional amendment, but that requires a 2/3rds majority in the Senate and we can’t even get 60 votes to break a filibuster much less the 67 needed for an amendment.