Wait so was that a suicide bombing?
At the time it was suggested an unwitting driver was used, thus the need to make it look like normal cargo. Probably a really pro-Russian one, because why not, they aren’t hard to find.
Ingenious
Hexane? How would that be explosive? I’d expect it to just make a big fire.
Somebody claimed that it wasn’t hexane, but hexogen.
Yeah I assumed this is just a mistranslation or a mixup, since hexogen and hexane do sound similar. For those of you not in the know, hexogen is also known as cyclonite or RDX and it’s what makes eg. C4 or Semtex go boom, while hexane is a very boring (in comparison) organic compound that doesn’t go boom nearly as much.
Ahhh! So RDX, if someone else hasn’t heard the name. Yeah, that makes sense. I bet it was a mistranslation.
Fuel air bomb. Similar this one with methane but it will work with any flammable vapour.
http://www.dynamicscience.com.au/tester/solutions1/chemistry/collisiontheory.htm
Huh, that’s really cool! It uses the fuel itself as a fuse to time the explosion. Hexane is a liquid, though, so the same principle wouldn’t quite work.
I’m buying that it was a mistranslation of “hexogen” (the high explosive RDX) at this point.
In liquid form absolutely agree.
But hexane is quite volatile so you can get a vapour mix fairly easily.
I have done this demo using methylated spirits by shaking the can before lighting and you get a nice boom.Getting a whole truckload to be stable for most of the journey and then to mix enough to go boom on the bridge is not in within the expertise of this chemistry teacher but I can see it might be possible.
Interesting point about Hexogen, but would be harder to hide it.
@CanadaPlus
It is a really cool demonstration though - and very useful for showing quite a few different things by changing the fuel.
