VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 months agoMath Rulediscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageMath Rulediscuss.tchncs.deVOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 months agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejanNatan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-25 months agoThis is the “Lagrangian standard model” - the mathematical formula explaining basically all physics as we know it. https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/the-deconstructed-standard-model-equation?language_content_entity=und When you DON’T assume spherical chickens in a vacuum, this is what you gotta calculate.
minus-squaremkwt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoWell, it’s a weightless chicken at least, because this model’s got no gravity.
minus-squareFrenziedFelidFanatic@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoThe SM is half the puzzle. The other half being Einstein’s field equations (which, despite the beautiful notation, are just as complex). Also, I will note that there are some spherical chickens in this equation as well—like massless neutrinos.
minus-squaredon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months ago assume spherical chickens in a vacuum lol that’s the next multiverse over, our solution works only with spherical cows in a vacuum.
minus-squareChicoSuave@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoOh man, that’ explains it. I’ve been using spherical swallows, which are roughly coconut sized. So really just use coconut maths.
minus-squaredon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agolol yfw you realize you coulda just used cubic swallows and called it a day
minus-squaresetVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoEither or works, we’re not that precise
minus-squaregerryflap@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoOkay, that’s actually quite impressive
This is the “Lagrangian standard model” - the mathematical formula explaining basically all physics as we know it.
https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/the-deconstructed-standard-model-equation?language_content_entity=und
When you DON’T assume spherical chickens in a vacuum, this is what you gotta calculate.
Well, it’s a weightless chicken at least, because this model’s got no gravity.
The SM is half the puzzle. The other half being Einstein’s field equations (which, despite the beautiful notation, are just as complex). Also, I will note that there are some spherical chickens in this equation as well—like massless neutrinos.
lol that’s the next multiverse over, our solution works only with spherical cows in a vacuum.
Oh man, that’ explains it. I’ve been using spherical swallows, which are roughly coconut sized. So really just use coconut maths.
lol yfw you realize you coulda just used cubic swallows and called it a day
Cubic african or european swallows?
Either or works, we’re not that precise
Okay, that’s actually quite impressive