• glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de
    0·
    3 months ago

    And you can recognize that there are multiple problems with different severity and need to be adressed from most severe to lowest severe.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      0·
      3 months ago

      Awful aggro to someone just pointing out a simple fact. They never said we don’t need to address large vehicles, or even that they shouldn’t be the first thing addressed. They’re simply pointing out that these aren’t a perfect golden bullet to the issues that plague cities, and we need to be aware of the downsides to any potential solution, and be willing and able to make the changes necessary to then fix THOSE issues. I don’t expect nuance, though, everything is a dichotomy online.

      • glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de
        0·
        3 months ago

        Awful aggro my ass, you cunt.

        But jokes aside: I interpreted the comment like they put teens on ebikes and our car favoring infrastructure on the same level. Those two problems are so far apart, that I think that my response isn’t too harsh, or even ‘Awful aggro’ (That’s an awfully aggro interpretation of my comment, by the way).

    • EatATaco@lemm.eeEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      Sure, but I’m responding to a comment that is suggesting they aren’t a problem. We don’t have to turn a blind eye to all other problems just because we think one is biggest.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.mlEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      Well since we can’t ban cars, the most severe problem, then I guess we can’t do anything. Good job defending the status quo I guess.