• whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you’re switching a couple extensions are uBlock origin and no script with Firefox, prevents most ads and lets you choose which hosts to accept JavaScript from temporarily or permanently.

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Mouse gestures is the killer-app for me on Firefox. Hate surfing without it.

      P.S. Do wish Firefox had tab groups tho.

        • sudo42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Firefox add-on for Tab Groups? I looked and couldn’t find one. At some point they appeared to try to support tab groups, but gave up? I dunno. I’ve only used Chrome a little. I don’t personally care for Chrome, but I found the tab groups useful.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I just searched “tab groups Firefox” and found results saying it has them. No idea as I wasn’t able to find relevant settings last time I tried on a PC. Mobile just now I tried adding tabs to a collection, but it doesn’t look like it did anything

            • sudo42@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Thanks, but I tried a few weeks back to get tab groups working for Firefox on MacOS. No joy.

              • psud@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Hope someone else chimes in on how to do this. I typically have hundreds of tabs open, groups were a godsend

                On mobile chrome I have “:D” tabs open which I occasionally go through and cull

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Vivaldi has in its inbuild ad/trackerblocker also filters to block cookie popups, no problem with this

        • uhN0id@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Would noscript allow you to block things like when a site packs your history with their website making it impossible to back out to the page you came from? How does it work considering so many sites now are built with JavaScript libraries like React?

          • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I dunno about the history but single page apps like react apps you can just accept the JS from the actual host in the address bar and leave all the rest turned off. Just tested on twitch. Accepting no JS loaded the home page and a spinner gif after selecting a stream. Accepted just twitch.tv and I could see the video stream and chat without having to accept any of the other hosts blocked.

            • uhN0id@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Rad. Thank you. Working on my switch to Firefox today. Between this noscript stuff and learning about styling Firefox with CSS I’m absolutely sold on the switch and no longer dread the process of ditching Chrome (mostly due to familiarity than anything else).

              Thanks for the info!

  • bruhduh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Everything enshitifies… Everything, problem that worries me that, Firefox will enshitify like this too one day

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      At that point it will be forked yet again, and that fork will take over. Mozilla is a very active open source member though.

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          How close did we come to being a footnote in the history of a future species that would happen upon our ruins ten thousand years from now? Would they indulge in the fiction of their own immortality until the Shivans came for them? And how long had this gone on? Did the Ancients stumble upon the monoliths and the tombs of their predecessors in this distant corner of space, dismissing the warnings carved into the walls of the sepulchre? And when the destroyers came at last, what did the Ancients think as they sifted the cremation of dust and bones, staring into the mute remains for a key; some solution to their plight?

          What if there had been countless races stretching back into infinity? And like the nine cities of Troy each civilization had been built on the rubble of one that came before. Each annihilated by the Shivans.

          The Ancients died eight thousand years ago, as humanity emerged from its neolithic infancy. They believed their voyage across the sea of stars awoke the dragon that slept beneath the waves. That the Shivans were birthed from the flux of subspace and their destruction was the revenge of an angry cosmos.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Mozilla has no traditional profit motive. The Mozilla Corporation, which develops Firefox, is a 100% subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation, which is legally a non-profit organisation.

      So, if the Mozilla Corporation makes a profit, they cannot pay out that profit to shareholders. Practically all they can do with that money, is to pay higher wages or set it aside for future invest in their products.

      That does not mean that they cannot stagnate or use money badly. And it does not either mean that they never need to make money. But it does mean that there’s no shareholders demanding short-term profit above all else.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The browsers are all quite good at copying your links, tabs, and history. Don’t worry, there will always be a good option, especially since open source has no strong path to enshittification

  • HKPiax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I love Firefox, but I can’t shake the feeling that it it’s slower on YouTube. My tinfoil hat theory is that Google somehow throttles YouTube on Firefox.

    • Ananace@lemmy.ananace.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      One thing you can test is to apply a Chrome user-agent on Firefox when visiting YouTube. In my personal experience that actually noticeably improves the situation.

      • HKPiax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s super interesting! I’m not versed enough though, do you have like a tutorial you recommend or should I just Google it?

        • Ananace@lemmy.ananace.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          There’s a bunch of extensions that allow you to switch user-agent easily, I personally use this one, it includes a list of known strings to choose between as well.

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            And to check that it’s working, there are websites you can go to which will tell you what browser they have detected you are using.

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Google does that a lot with their own web properties. I remember Google Meet didn’t support background replacement on Firefox, but switching Firefox’s user agent to Chrome suddenly fixed it.

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      For YouTube on IOS, I use Brave. It does a decent (but not perfect) job of hiding ads on YT.

    • cowfodder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m pretty sure someone discovered that is true recently, but can’t be assed to try to find it right now.

    • Promethiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You haven’t experienced slow until you try to take Firefox through Google Cloud Console or Search Tools. 15 seconds in Chrome, somehow turns into 3 minutes in Firefox, funny how it does that.

      • Norgur@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s a really weird take. Like… what even is the difference supposed to be?

        This sounds more like “everything should be as it was back when <insert arbitrary point in time here>! When there were still Webpages, and we were frolicking about the internet! Until the fire nation attacked Web apps took over!”

        • Safipok@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Basically I am saying Firefox is not as performant as chromium when loading JavaScript.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Don’t agree, nothing noticeable for me anyhow. Chrome has the ultimate drawback: being under the control of a monopolistic evil corporation

          • Ananace@lemmy.ananace.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            In general, browser benchmarks seem to often favor Firefox in terms of startup and first interaction timings, and often favor Chrome when it comes to crunching large amounts of data through JavaScript.
            I.e. for pages which use small amounts of JavaScript, but call into it quickly after loading, Firefox tends to come out on top. But for pages which load lots of JavaScript and then run it constantly, Chrome tends to come out on top.

            We’re usually talking milliseconds-level of difference here though. So if you’re using a mobile browser or a low-power laptop, then the difference is often not measurable at all, unless the page is specifically optimized for one or the other.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s not tinfoil, they have been caught doing it and they continue to do it. It’s a scumbag company.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        How the fuck they haven’t been slapped with an anticompetitive is beyon - oohh right. End stage capitalism

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same happens with Safari. The page loads in a weird funky way, video sorta first and then comments and suggestions many seconds later.

      On Chrome on the exact same computer it’s instant.

      They’re doing it on purpose.

    • Norgur@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well, Google will probably optimize their shit for their own privacy invasion sniffing tool browser twice as hard as for Firefox and such

    • adventor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Do you use YouTube so much that a small performance difference on a single Site has an influence on your browser choice?

  • MewtwoLikesMemes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly, I’m less worried about the speed and moreso I just don’t like supporting Google’s de facto monopoly of the Web’s infrastructure.

    • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The thing is, using a Chromium-based browser isn’t contributing to their monopoly unless Google holds sway over the fork. Brave, Vivaldi, those two are generally fine and stand against what Google has been up to.

      • Vittelius@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        They are contributing to Google’s hold over web specs. If Google decides to implement a feature off spec, then website developers will optimise for that implementation because it will be the implementation used by all chromium based browsers. And that leads to worse performance for other browsers with a more correct implementation.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Sure it is. Everyone starts trying to be sure things render correctly on Chromium based browsers and nothing else. Next thing you know people say “Wow Chromium based browsers render pages more reliably than everything else” and then you end up somewhere not too differently from where we were heading. Everything that’s not based on Chromium starts getting tossed aside.

      • jose1324@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I dunno. Using chromium with a little editing, but 90% og chromium is basically the same monopoly.

          • Kichae@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            You can’t truly degoogle chromium without a hard fork. Soft forks are still enabling them and their grip on the web, even if they’re not specifically spying on you in particular.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Firefox is slower, not because it’s worse, but Gecko is a minority engine in the web (~3-4%) and because of this the most webs are optimized for Blink. That is the only reason and because most current Browsers are using it, a devils circle. The result of leaving Google hands-free for too long and that for 20 years the number of available engines has remained stagnant (3 and some testimonial exotic forks) because it is the most complicated part of a browser. Little can be done now.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I usualy love it, but for some reason Firefox fails to retrieve web pages about 75% of the time when on the internet connection at my parent’s house, and I don’t know why.

    It acts like a DNS failure, but the DNS settings are the same in Firefox, Chrome, and the router.

    Meanwhile Chrome and Edge work great.

    • qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      pretty sure thats a goat. rugged, contrary and independent. one might even say… the Greatest Of All Time.

  • 6mementomori@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    does anyone recommend any Firefox alternatives? I genuinely hate Firefox’s UI and keybinds and the scrolling tabs

    • AliOski@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Floorp, I use it and I love it. It’s especially great for Opera refugees, it has workspaces and stuff. Soon Firefox will support tab groups natively, and then Floorp will be perfect. It’s a Firefox fork though.

      • Tab groups and non-independent tab muting (seems like it was domain-specific rather than tab-specific last I tried) are the two main things that kept me from switching back to FF as my primary browser (still use it for DTA, for example, but DTA got a big nerf back during the major extension overhaul, so that was a letdown). Tried some extensions, but none really worked in a way I considered usable and didn’t want to just keep trial and erroring through them given I already have a browser that functionally meets my needs, even if I’d rather not be using a chromium browser.

        If native tab groups work well enough, I’ll probably give it another chance.

          • I sometimes just need to mute something for a second that I’m otherwise listening to. Or I’m switching between multiple sources, and don’t want like 3 or more playing at the same time… usually all on the same domain. I don’t want to have to actually go to the tab and mute it. I’m frequently muting and unmuting things that way to the point that even if its the only source of sound, I still mute by tab instead of just turning my computer volume off sometimes out of habit, so its a deal breaker.

            I think this just says more about the perils of embracing untreated ADHD than the internet itself.

    • sga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      you may not even have to change to another browser or fork, please have a look at some designs in https://trickypr.github.io/FirefoxCSS-Store.github.io/ select a design and follow the page, and you shall find the instructions (usually just downloading/pasting userChrome/Content.css)

      and for scrolling tabs, if your problem is very small tab size, then try changing browser.tabs.tabMinWidth in about:config

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I never really cared that a browser could load a page in 1.5 seconds instead of 1.9… I mean who cares?

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I didn’t care until it consistently loaded faster.
      That’s now my new baseline, and anything slower than ‘instant’ is annoying.
      I would care if that was no longer the case, because I don’t like being constantly annoyed.

      That said, I don’t think the page loading speed is noticeably different between major browsers.
      The addons, customisation, privacy and resource usage are where it’s at.

      I’m just hoping that some competition to chromium stays afloat.

  • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    One thing I’ve been annoyed with after switching to Firefox is the iffy password manager performance. It’s so common for it not to remember a password that it should, or, weirdly, for it to only remember the password once I’ve typed the whole username in and hit tab.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I haven’t experienced that. What is the use-case that makes this happen? I have one machine with only 8 gig and firefox is fine, and a 16 and 32 gig machine, firefox has never eaten 8 gigs

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        What they mean is “I use woefully malformed websites loaded up with all sorts of weird shit that eats ram on the regular, and somehow that’s my browser’s fault”

      • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have a VPS with 1 GB of RAM and Firefox with up to 3 tabs is fine. OK, it’s running Linux maybe FF on Windows is worse.

  • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Functionality wise, chrome is better than Firefox but it’s bad when it comes to privacy and ads

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      What is literally one thing Chrome can do that Firefox cannot? Cause I can tell you right now, after tomorrow, only one can block ads.

      • spicystraw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        To be fair, Chrome does generally render most websites faster and correctly. I have Chrome installed just in case of some webpages not working with Firefox. Now, that’s not Mozillas fault, but from user standpoint makes Chrome more attractive browser to use.

      • magz :3@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        WebGPU, WebHID and h.265 are all unsupported on firefox

        that said, i still daily drive firefox with mostly no problems, but saying that it can do everything chrome can is just flat out wrong

        this is by design mind you, chrome have a big enough market share that they can basically just add whatever they want to the web standards and all other browsers just have to try to keep up. i imagine that’s part of the reason that chromium skins are so widespread

    • asudox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      By default, I doubt that Firefox is better at privacy than Chrome. Actually even worse than Chrome I’d say. But you can customize Firefox to be much more privacy friendlier than Chrome. That is the functionality Chrome lacks. The last time I tried out Ungoogled chromium, it sucked ass. Websites actually loaded slower than on Firefox for me. And both had uBlock Origin installed. I tried those fancy GPU stuff as well, almost nothing changed.