• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, it’s centered around large nodes, that’s the point they’re making.

      Over 50% of the network’s capacity in the hands of 5 entities?

      https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/vo86ki/over_half_of_all_lightning_network_capacity_is/

      Shit’s decentralized as fuck yo!

      Heck, Bitcoin itself had the majority of its hashrate coming from a dictatorship where the state needs to have a representative in all major companies… One move and the Chinese government had control over the network.

      #decentralization

      • SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nobody is forcing you to use the big nodes. Saying lightning is centralized because of that is like saying bitcoin is centralized because exchanges hold coins.

          • SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes, because it is even more wrong. One of the most mobile industries in the world that seeks cheap power concentrates where that cheap power is available. China ban bitcoin, miners moved away. Miners can always simply move somewhere else. That already happened and you don’t even know it.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ok, so you ignored what I said.

              China could have seized all mining equipment just by deciding to nationalize the industry instead of banning it, boom, 51%+ of the hashrate in the hands of the Chinese government. What were Bitcoin maximalists saying at the time? Fuck dick, as long as the price goes up, who cares about the tech behind it?

              • SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                could have

                Yes, and the sky could fall on our heads.

                It didn’t happen, and it can’t happen any more.

                What were Bitcoin maximalists saying at the time

                They always knew miners are super mobile.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “It can’t happen anymore”

                  Except they Chinese hashrate went back up even though mining is still illegal… Which begs the question… Did the miners really move out of China or did they simply hide the fact that they’re in China?

      • Feddyteddy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is like saying Lemmy is centralized because lemmy.world exists. This senseless rambling may work elsewhere, but Lemmy has too many computer literate users for you to gain any traction here.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Eh… Lemmy has too many computer literate users for Bitcoin maximalists and crypto to have taken a hold on the place, funny that!