• 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Right off the bat i read

    One standout statistic was that projects with clear requirements documented before development started were 97 percent more likely to succeed. In comparison, one of the four pillars of the Agile Manifesto is “Working Software over Comprehensive Documentation.”

    You need clearly defined requirements to write a good user story. Documentation comes after.

    However, while the Agile Manifesto might have its problems, those stem more from its implementation rather than the principles themselves. “We don’t need a test team because we’re Agile” is a cost-saving abdication of responsibility.

    Precisely, once once have i worked in a company where agile was properly implemented and, yes, user stories were well documented and discussed before being developed. All others are just waterfall in disguise, or Fragile™.

    However, while the Agile Manifesto might have its problems, those stem more from its implementation rather than the principles themselves. “We don’t need a test team because we’re Agile” is a cost-saving abdication of responsibility.

    • mal3oon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You need clearly defined requirements to write a good user story.

      This is the main reason the last company I worked for lacked in project delivery. They had just transitioned to Agile, and their whole teams lacked proper Agile experience and the training provided was very superficial. They barely put any time in refining the requirements and this trickled down to developers.

    • Elise@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Projects that allow for clear requirements before really starting on them are clearly more likely to succeeded than ones that have a higher complexity due to unknowns.