Arthur C. Clark

so the following can be categorically as magic:

  • food replicator
  • beam transporter/tractor
  • holodeck
  • ns1@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I remember reading that the transporter was added to TOS mainly to speed up storytelling, with the technobabble behind it being expanded on later. Then replicators/holodeck put in TNG because it made sense based on similar technology. So basically you’re exactly right, it is magic

    • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, transporters were originally made to avoid the high production costs of models, which would have been necessary to use for shuttles back then.

      Very smart imo.

      • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Smart in one way but it did cause a lot of storytelling problems because they constantly had to come up with half baked excuses for why it wasn’t working this time when just using the transporter would solve a major problem without fuss.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          A much better implementation of transporters, from a storytelling point of view, is in Stargate, where the various versions of the technology all have pros and cons.

          The ring systems are point-to-point only but they can punch through a lot of interference. The Asgard systems work more like the Star Trek systems but they’re much more easily interdicted.