• Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not an Elon fan, but he’s not removing the mute feature… Which makes a bad headline but is accurate.

    There was this whole debate with Mastodon because at least it didn’t originally have a block button either and a bunch of the Twitter converted were outraged.

    The thing is, blocking is pretty meaningless when you have a public profile. In a sense it’s a false sense of security, because if someone is really trying to stalk you, all they have to do is open another browser, open your profile, and not login to the site.

    • kraftpudding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Idk, there’s definitely cases were blocking is super important. For example, small/ish institutions that attract a disproportionate amount of hate online but still serve important functions. One that comes to mind is @auschwitzmuseum… like it’s always gonna attract holocaust deniers, and not blocking them just exposes people who want to support it to antisemitism all the time.

      This is just one example I’ve witnessed, but there must be many many more. Planned Parenthood…Charities that help people that are considered undesirables. Generally any institution dealing with “controversial” fields. I could go on.