• Goat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wholeheartedly agree with the moral character of Ukraine’s self defense. What I don’t agree with, however, is the moral character of the US, a supplier of “aid” that never gives anything to anyone for free.

    I once again inquire what fascist state you were so unbelievably convinced I was simping for.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I wholeheartedly agree with the moral character of Ukraine’s self defense.

      How curious, because you began by stating

      to think this conflict involves “the good guys” in some way is laughable

      It’s almost like a classic motte-and-bailey argument.

      What I don’t agree with, however, is the moral character of the US, a supplier of “aid” that never gives anything to anyone for free.

      Yes, here we have the horrible motivation of [checks notes] not wanting Ukraine, a country who we have fairly close ties with, annexed by an authoritarian dictatorship who constantly causes trouble for us. Truly, we are vile opportunists here.

      I once again inquire what fascist state you were so unbelievably convinced I was simping for.

      Russia. And if you believe this conflict is something best described in ‘shades of gray’, then I still regard you as simping for Russia, in the same way that Juche apologists sometimes admit fault with North Korea, but always immediately pivot to “But South Korea Just As Bad™”. Playing “Bothsides!” games is old hat. It’s been overused. No one falls for it anymore. Sorry.

      • Goat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I do think that the substance of our disagreement here is minute and the “no good side” statement I opened this with is far from the best way of wording what I was referring to here. Please note, however, that at no point did I bring “shades of gray” or “both sides equally bad” into the conversation, and that the antagonistic nature of your gotcha is deeply reductive, insensitive and automated.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’m sorry, I’ll be more sensitive to people who parrot the same narratives that genocidal states in the process of committing genocide do in the future. Especially considering your assertion that Ukraine isn’t a democratic state ‘in any sense of the word’, which is definitely rooted in reality and totally not a line pushed by Russian propaganda.

          Maybe next time I find an Israel supporter who insists on the ‘complexity’ of the ongoing Gaza genocide I’ll give them an asspat and a kiss on the cheek instead of my usual “What the fuck is wrong with you?”

          • Goat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I did not interpret my original comments as genocidal rhetoric, but seeing as how they have been interpreted, I now realize that they contain an element analogous to that of “the conflict in Gaza is too complex”. I am sorry for causing this pointless argument and will be more careful with the implications of concise opinions from now on.

            • notabot@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I just wanted to say ‘well done’ for going over what you said, realizing how it could be interpreted adversely, and admitting it. Not enough people are willing to do that, so well done!

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I tend to be aggressive because I find a lot of people playing apologist for Russia, often utilizing doublespeak and changing the tack of their argument when confronted, only to return to it later when the examination is less thorough, not only on here but also in person.

              I apologize that I was too quick to assume motives in this case.

              • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                So I missed y’all’s argument, but I really appreciate how you both realized that you’d made thoughtless posts, apologized, and removed them.

                It’s a rare thing to see online.