Today in our newest take on “older technology is better”: why NAT rules!

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well, there is Punycode, which, if I understand correctly, is a layer before DNS, which translates a Unicode string into a DNS-compatible ASCII string.

    I don’t actually recommend using that, though. Every so often, the ugly ASCII string shows up in places, because Punycode translation isn’t implemented there. Certainly increases administration complexity.

    • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah I’ve heard about punycode. Personally, I’m well against it because it puts down non-MURRICAN English domain names as second-class citizens on the internet. If I have a website about Copiapó, a perfectly legal town, there’s no good reason why the domain name should not be copiapó.cl rather than copiap-xcwhngoingohi4oleleiyho42yt4ptg4ht4.cl, making it look “suspect” and “malware-y”.

      There were quite some complains back in the time about Firefox choosing not to “flag” internationalized names as potentially dangerous, and pretty much all those complaints that I know of likely came from English speakers who simply can’t understand other countries in the world even can have different alphabets.