• pastabatman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I know it’s just a meme, but Krusty would be a silly and ineffective president at worst. You’d have to combine the worst traits of many of the shows most horrible characters to create someone similar to trump, and even then I’m not sure any character in that show attempted a coup and sent a mob to attack the Capitol.

    • Zahtu@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah Kristy is better than this dipshit orange, fascism and racism spilling trash can of a human meat bag.

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      “When you get home there will be another floor on your house” -Hank Scorpio

      I got to say Hank was a great boss. Really rewarded his team. The kind person we should all strive to be.

  • StThicket@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    It amazes me that one of the largest countries in the world, with the most diverse demographics, can only chose between two candidates. This is not democracy. It’s a shit show that has been going on for far too long.

        • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Presumably what the other commenter was referring to is the US having the oldest codified constitution

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Which is honestly meaningless but very convenient for US narrations. There were also older de facto constitutions, which are usually forgotten like the Henrician Articles of P-L Commonwealth. US constitution is famous because it was the one which was loudly proclaimed and imitated later.

        • Hirom@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          That’s interesting. Thanks for pointing it out.

          My point is having a very old constitution isn’t much of a boast if keeping it as-is causes political issues.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Just mention an alternative and you’ll will quickly understand why.

      The parties have done the most amazing job in pretending the world will end at every election if they are not chosen.

      • pastabatman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I agree with this. But also, this time is the closest to “end of the world” stakes we’ve had in recent memory. We have a literal criminal, rapist, and fraudster who already tried to overthrow the government once leading the polls.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          2016 called they want their gaslighting back. Trump isn’t the final form of Fascism. He’s getting close but he ain’t it.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is kind of amazing how even those disenfranchised voters will rally to support the hegemony of the “two party” corporatist rule. I suggested recently we could consider rallying behind a single issue 3rd party candidate who would end the legalized bribes and replace FPTP with a more democratic alternative, and was immediately downvoted and told it’s not possible due to FPTP.

        facepalm

        • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The problem is, yes its its theoreticaly possible, but praticaly speaking it would be near impossible.

          Theoretically, you need to get 51% of the population all vote for one person. However, with FPTP, you get one choice on the ballot. Is the average voter going to risk their vote on a 3rd party, or vote for who they belive to be the “lesser evil” of the two that have a shot at winning.

          Even if you do manage to get 51%, there’s the electoral collage. Never forget, our democracy has built-in the ability to overwrite the presidential vote.

          Your first hurdle is getting any one to name an independent candidate.

        • glitchdx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          In order for a 3rd option to be viable, the entire system must change. I’m not holding my breath.

          Between now and then, all we can do is vote for the less bad of two evils.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Is that a 3rd option in a first past the post system?

        Hmmmm… what could be the issue there I wonder.

    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      didn’t you vote in the primary? why not?

      Americans got to choose between many candidates, and out of those, it’s down to 6, and of those 6, it’s only really likely 2, that’s true.

      But it isn’t quite like you imply.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The RNC never intended to run a candidate other than Trump because he controls MAGA, which is what remains of their energized base. The primaries they held were “just in case” Merrick Garland actually did something useful and successfully prosecuted Trump for insurrection, which never came to pass.

        The DNC did everything they could to prevent primary elections from occurring in various states, and bullied anyone who was floating a run into submission. This included the state dept making calls to state DNC committees to cancel primaries, or remove certain candidates from their ballots. According to them, it was an insult to Biden admin and their legacy to even suggest another candidate should run. And now look where that’s gotten us.

        So no, we didn’t actually vote in primaries this year because the establishment refuses to relinquish the status quo.

          • StThicket@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I understand what you are trying to say. Ultimately, there are only two to vote for. Ideally, there should be more than two parties, and more than two candidates. That’s how democracies work. What you have is a dysfunctional system that divides people in two groups, and there are no incentives to cooperate between parties. Proper voting is also suffering due to the two-party system.

            https://youtu.be/yhO6jfHPFQU

            In my country, the parties with the majority of votes and the ability to cooperate gets to form a government. We also try to make it easy to get people to vote, insted of your system of gerrymandering.

      • nobody158@r.nf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The shitty thing is by the time my states primary pretty much every else has dropped out. We need to run the primary like a real election not piecemeal.

  • halvar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m from Europe (Hungary) and I watched the first 20 minutes of the debate (with the intent of finishing the whole thing in one go) before turning it off while basically being on the brink of crying. The US presidents basically have as much say in my life as my own government (if not more) and even though I can’t vote for them, if I had to I’d be lost. Because it’s not that one is old and the other is crazy it’s a freaking Venn diagram of crazy RFK jr., demented Biden and then of course crazy and demented Trump. Seeing the debate and how these people basically can’t put two sentences after each other without breaking up is terrifying. And one of them will be voted into the most important office on the planet.

    I mean it’s shit over here. We can choose between a guy who already stole half of our country, someone whose messy divorce somehow made him the most important member of the opposition and this other guy who stole the other half of the country before the current dude did. (And that’s just the tip of the iceberg). But maaan are we a lot better off than the world’s greatest country where two unsupervised parties get to point at the people you can vote into this ridiculously powerful position. And then they pick these guys.

    We’re all going to die and I can’t even vote for whoever gets us killed, which is ultimately for the better. This way I can die with a clear conscience.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      … which is ultimately for the better. This way I can die with a clear conscience.

      i envy you and i wish i could say the same thing because i have to vote for biden or else we’ll regress backwards in addition to dying.

      • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        He lost me when he called Biden the “ethical candidate”. He is the less disgusting choice, but he is in no way an “ethical choice”.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think he means ethical in the way he explained it after he said that- ethical in that he respects the oath of office and doesn’t use it to enrich himself.

          I am sure that Cuban is politically savvy enough that there is no such thing as a truly ethical president (except maybe Jimmy Carter).

              • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Until there is literally a smoking gun, I have no serious reason to believe that Carter is anything less than a man who has done his best to be good. He was also a human being, and I’m sure people can dig up a bad interaction if they look hard enough. Still, it doesn’t invalidate his lifetime of attempts at making a positive impact on the world.

                Carter ain’t no Cosby.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I want to know why Piers “Punchable Face” Morgan is even trying to weigh in.

        I guess he’s getting ready for the inevitable GB + US merger, thinking that countries should function like corporations.

      • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The bottom line is he could drool and only say the word potato and the fact is still that we are voting for a platform and a supreme court, not a public speaker.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well, what are we supposed to do? Choose a presidential candidate who was born after the Battle of the Bulge?

  • Ranvier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Age up the clown some too with some wrinkles, that clown is 78, almost as old as the other guy.

    Also poor Krusty, being compared to Trump.