• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s just not enough houses, though. Measurably. Banning landlords would be bad news for anyone who can’t afford a mortgage downpayment.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like former office space or whatever? That’s not what OP said, but encouraging repurposing is an idea worth talking about.

        • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, as in single family homes. If the building was expressly built with density in mind (think triplex and above) then it’s fine IMO. This reduces the land scarcity side of the equation, as well as incentivizes density.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, we could do a Castro and just nationalise all rentals, in theory. Growing a government department that plays the role of every landlord at once would be a big project, though, and of course it’s not politically viable at the moment. And we’d still have a housing shortage.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not public housing, social housing. We could seed self-owning housing coops.