Advertisers care mainly about 18-35 year olds, and now that streaming has ads that key demographic is important for the survival of the franchise.
Besides if the franchise hadn’t expanded its fanbase in the 90s it wouldn’t be viable now. And let’s face it, it’s not that significant outside North America. Gone are the days when US audiences were adequate for survival.
Ah yes, the eternal sin of “trying to attract new viewers.”
Why can’t they continue catering to the original, immortal fanbase? That’s just good business!
As if Star Trek is starving for a fan base.
The aging fanbase has been an issue that’s been highlighted recently by Jonathan Frakes, among others.
Advertisers care mainly about 18-35 year olds, and now that streaming has ads that key demographic is important for the survival of the franchise.
Besides if the franchise hadn’t expanded its fanbase in the 90s it wouldn’t be viable now. And let’s face it, it’s not that significant outside North America. Gone are the days when US audiences were adequate for survival.
Indeed, Trek seems to do very well in the US, Canada, UK, Australia, and Germany. After that it drops off pretty quickly.
They expanded it by making quality shows. Also isn’t your first line contradictory since this is aimed at a younger demographic?