• hibsen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I didn’t, and won’t, because she’s just as irrelevant now as she was in the last election.

        • hibsen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Dude, self help book lady from the 90s who has never held any office, never done anything remotely useful politically, and has literally dropped out of this race twice already has nothing useful to contribute.

          Oh wait. That’s why she speaks to you, isn’t it. That sense of “making your voice heard” even though neither of you has anything useful to say.

          • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            28 days ago

            She’s a registered Democrat. Does her voice not matter?

            From the interview:

            “I think the Democratic leadership completely underestimates the level of disgust that Americans are feeling due to their cowardice, due to their hypocrisy. You know, the issue is not just crisis; it’s crisis management. And they are failing at crisis management,” Williamson told Phillips.

            “If [Biden] doesn’t want to give up the delegates, he doesn’t have to. It’s called an intervention. It’s called Hakeem Jeffries and Senator Schumer and whomever else walking into a room with the president, with the First Lady, with Hunter – whomever – and saying, this has got to stop. You are risking our victory in November,” Williamson said.

            Where is she wrong?

            • hibsen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              In the sense of determining election results, her voice does not statistically matter. No one with half a brain takes her seriously enough to listen to anything she says.

              She’s wrong in thinking (and I use the term generously) that Jeffries, Schumer, or “whomever” can have an intervention with the POTUS like he’s an addict on a bender. She’d probably know how ridiculous that sounds if she’d ever, you know, done anything useful politically.

                • hibsen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  Oh so you’re shifting away from the entirety of this article and anything dipshit the woo-woo self-help author says to…what, exactly? Restating your delusion that if you just complain loudly enough and stupidly enough on a website barely anyone reads, that somehow that’ll make entrenched power step aside for…well, I’m sure you’ll all think of a name later?

                  Did you suddenly realize that sinking effort into defending this irrelevant dipshit might make others realize how dumb and likely dishonest your opinion is? Yeah bit late there.

                  Grow the fuck up. Replacing Biden happens if Biden is dead. Either he wins now or it’s over. Maybe consider focusing on the fight that actually exists instead of the one that was never a real possibility except in delusional peoples’ heads.

                  Or keep trying to divide the democratic base like you’re doing here. I assume that’s your real goal, and also why you can’t manage to make any arguments that hold water.

                  • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    28 days ago

                    Williamson has some great policies including reparations and universal healthcare but you won’t listen to her ideas anyways.

                    Replacing Biden happens if Biden is dead. Either he wins now or it’s over.

                    So that’s it? Trump wins because of Biden’s ego and refusal to step aside? Got it.