The only real attempt at monetisation that I’ve seen is https://beetoons.tv/, but they use their own crypto - making it like Odysee. Why is that?

Edit: Please, before you answer consider this monetisation doesn’t mean ads!

  • Handles@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The userbase is still anti-business.

    And a significant part will remain so. This should be a haven from capitalist/corporate platforms, not a parallel market.

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Community is not enough

      I’m still doggedly working on Communick and on AP-based projects because I believe in open standards and because it is our best shot at us collectively take back the web. But if we continue on this idea that the Fediverse is somehow “better” because it discriminates against small business owners, or professionals who want an online presence to promote their work, or anything that resembles “profit-motive”, then this whole thing will forever remain a wasted opportunity, and we will be (once again) be giving it all away for Zuckerberg.

      What we have now is just a Tyranny of the Minority. We need to grow the open web. That includes getting normies here. That includes getting people who are not part of your tribe. This includes getting people that you are able to ignore.

    • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s Western fediverse.

      Fediverse instance in Asia often run ads or other kind of monetisation. Like the second biggest instance.