• Quack Doc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Do we really need to be so constantly cringy about it? Yes, custom ROMs are great. I run one. Lots of other people run one. They’re great. Don’t get me wrong. But you have to realize most people simply don’t care for one, Most vendors also don’t really support their phones well under GSI, so things like camera and stuff like that hardly ever work properly.

    In a lot of cases, it is quite a bit of work to get a custom rom flashed and have it working well. The technological skill gap between most people who will run an Android phone and even enthusiasts who will so much as think about installing a custom ROM is so massive that you may as well be a hacker to them.

    • Zerfallen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      For me it’s 100% about banking or payment apps that won’t run if they detect a custom ROM or root. Otherwise i would consider the effort worth it, if only to free the device from the manufacturer’s limited update commitment.

      • Nate@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ironically, I have to root every time I install a ROM just to bypass the detections 🤦‍♂️

      • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I do absolutely agree that this sucks. However, most people don’t actually need this. Yes, it’s very convenient, but I found that pretty much all banking apps, at least for people I have helped support, offer a web client anyways that’s just as good. It’s only missing things like NFC tap payment.

        Of course, don’t get me wrong. A lot of solutions don’t offer web UIs, and that sucks. But we can’t force everyone to be a not shitty developer Sadly.

        I also do really miss tap payments with my phone. It’s really nice just taking my phone when I go shopping and maybe $20 in cash. Not needing to worry about my car or anything else.

  • Boeddabart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    While i agree and support a lot with what you are saying / trying to do, i’m not sure this is the right way to reach people. I’d say keep your blog going, but try find some nicer words and images and such (not the Anonymous kind of stuff…). The content comes off a little… strange (the word ‘cringy’ in the other comment was kinda wellplaced too), i hope you anderstand.

    And i’m afraid most people won’t be reached at all unless other ROMs are more (easier) available, like being pre-installed on devices you buy in stores.

    Wished i could be of help in any way, i like your intentions and input!

    • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Out of all the people you could blame, you literally chose to blame the single least affected party here. Google has actually taken great strides to make custom ROMs as easy as humanly possible without stepping on the toes of vendors.

      Google does a lot of stuff people should hate, but this is not one of them.

      • siftmama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Google has actually taken great strides to make custom ROMs as easy as humanly possible

        I guess that is besides:

        • slowly, but surely, stopping development of many AOSP core apps in favour of their own proprietary apps.
        • ensuring many of their apps are basically unusable with a custom ROM
        • making it so easy for app devs to block custom ROMs

        Dunno, but that’s all Google stuff.

        • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I highly disagree with this assessment.

          First, addressing your first point. Yes, they are stopping development of some core AOSP apps, but we are talking about apps which have had very good, oftentimes way better, alternative FOSS applications anyways. I really don’t see this being an issue at all.

          For the second and third part. Google can sometimes do this with their core apps. Sometimes I suppose but GAPPs works on pretty much any custom ROM I’ve ever tried it on. Whether it be open gaps or microg. If you’re talking about things like Google Play Certification and safety net, I also disagree there. It’s a tool that Google provides if application devs don’t want to use it they don’t need to. Many devs DO want it. That’s not Google’s fault.

          Application developers want, and sometimes need this level of security. Regardless of what anybody says, attestation is indeed a critical part of security.

          • pelletbucket@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            because Android is google? it’s supposed to be this Grand unified ecosystem, Google apps on a Google operating system on a Google phone, but anytime you have an issue with one of them, they all blame every other department so nobody helps you. Google has been hiding accessibility features behind paywalls since Android 11 as well.

            • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              can you give a few examples of the a11y issues that don’t have at least somewhat well known alternatives that work more or less the same way?

              Personally I run android completely without gapps or even aurora store, the only proprietary apps I do actually use is discord my retarded router’s only method of accsessing the settings, eero app

              • pelletbucket@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’m afraid I don’t understand the question. are you asking if you can work around the broken multitasking feature? the only way you can do that is by cracking apps so that they’ll play in the background

                • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  what’s broken about multitasking? It’s working fine for me on Android 14. I use split view and desktop mode fairly often without issues, any specific applications that are broken?

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Depends on the circle of people you’re talking to… I’m not buying any phone without custom ROM support. And haven’t done so in ages. I know several other people who’ve used LineageOS, GrapheneOS or Calyx at some point. I wouldn’t say it’s normal, but definitely not a unicorn encounter either. Just embrace it. You’re a hacker now. Maybe this is a good thing. (Most certainly.)

    I feel I should also say, times changed. Back in the day it was either impossible to run a Custom ROM because of some locked bootloader. Or it’d run perfectly smooth. Sometimes you’d be running a ROM of some 15 yo because that’s the last person supporting that device. Today some things have changed. Security works differently. Lots of people use things like NFC payment that doesn’t work that well without stock. More and more stuff has moved into the proprietary Google services. Cameras have become super complicated and AI enhanced. Running a Custom ROM feels very different from what it was 8 years ago. If you own one of the well-supported devices anyways. Because that was always an issue.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I wish this stuff was a little more mainstream. Part of it is simply self-interest: there would be more unlockable devices and fewer app developers trying to block their apps from running on third-party ROMs if more people ran them.

      Part of it is I think that would be a better world. Big tech would have a bit less power. Devices would last longer.

      • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        It was a lot more mainstream in the early days of android. When the companies used to lock internet tethering, you had to root to benefit from it.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Flashing a custom ROM is an arcane process, most up to date documentation is hidden in chat apps and if you miss a step, you risk boot-looping your device with no chance of recovery or warranty.