It often feels like there are only 3 productive hours in typical American white collar work day.

What if we just cut out the rest?

Edit: Some great responses. So responses must have also been said about the 5 day and 40 hour work weeks.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    As a non-white-collar worker, I always find conversations like this very alienating. The idea of being on the clock while not working is bizarre to me.

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why would you be on the clock? You work 3 hours and that pays enough money.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s why a lot of roles like this are salaried. My productivity can’t be measured by how fast I turn a crank.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah at that point in the career, the comp is for being available during business hours and moving work in professional, reliable and competent manner. Nobody is checking unless somebody is complaining.

        People could add tasks but there is no pay incentive so why bother. That’s just give out labour for free lol

        Dont be a bootlicker. Get paid!

  • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    For many jobs, it won’t change much. My advisor comes to the university 3 days a week, and stays for 4 ish hours. But he’s a very good researcher with high research output. (I do math, this might not be possible for lab based researchers.)

    Usually these jobs can’t be measured in hours you spend in your workplace. You’re kind of always working since you can’t really turn your brain off while working on an interesting problem, but what others see is that you’re sipping coffee with your laptop open.

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thoroughly believe that 4 hours is the limit for most people (on most days) on how long they can focus deeply on a problem. That was at least my experience as a mathematics grad student. In math this is more evident because most of high level math requires this deep level of understanding.

      Of course one thinks about these problems while doing other things (obsession is a common consequence of prolonged deep thinking), which is why visits to the restroom, walks outside and so on are famous to prove very productive.

      Either way, math is also social (most problem solving benefits from discussion) and it is in my opinion much more productive to set some time off for talking about / working on stuff with others than grinding through longer. This is still work and incidentally also good time and resource management.

      • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Of course. My friends who are doing research on Physics or Biology tell me that I always seem to be free. The truth is, I’m always kind of working. It’s very hard to shut off your brain when you’re tackling with some intriguing problem. I’ve found myself think about work while out with the boys for drinks lol.

  • Alsjemenou@lemy.nl
    link
    fedilink
    Nederlands
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Congratulations you just figured out how to have four jobs without breaks.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The only problem that I would have with the 3-hour work day is that sometimes they’re generally is more work to do. Average is probably only about 3 hours but occasionally you need more.

    Although quite a lot of time could be saved by not having meetings about meetings about when you’re going to have a meeting to book the meeting. But let’s be reasonable that’s not happening.

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Then you miss out the unmentioned part of the work - idle thinking. Not only the time spent typing something on the keyboard is work. All the time spent thinking how to solve a problem is also work.

    • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not how my employer measures productivity. They use keystrokes per minute. Gotta get good at idle typing.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Office drones forget that society requires different types of work done to function… They ways got that bias lol it is cross cultural too

    • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Walking to get a coffee is when I’ve solved some of the most complex problems in my head. Walking to get a coffee was also one of the few times I’d leave my desk. What even was lunch…

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It sounds great! The real trick would be finding any company willing to pay the same 40 hours of wages every week for 15 hours of work. There’s not much point to a 3 hour work day if you have work 3 different jobs

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s not much point to a 3 hour work day if you have work 3 different jobs

      Not that I’m advocating for it, but… Working 3 jobs @ 15 hours a week each would mean you’d be a lot more resilient against layoffs and would be able to quit any of those jobs at the drop of a hat if things got shitty (knowing you’d only be losing 1/3 of your income, rather than 100% of it). It would represent a solid shift of power into the hands of the workers.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        i’ve been down that road before. three part time jobs means no benefits and no employer-sponsored health coverage. it’s also extremely difficult to schedule multiple part time jobs so they don’t conflict with each other while still giving you something resembling ‘weekend’ off.

      • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        True, but the whole point of having a shorter work week would be to have more free time wouldn’t three jobs kind of defeat the whole purpose? That would just mean I wake up dreading three jobs instead of one…

        • timmytbt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          And all the wasted time getting from one job to the next. Even if the travel is all virtual you still have to get setup/organised, put one thing down and pick another up.

          • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            And what happens if job 2 doesn’t start for like 2 hours after job 1 and job 3 doesn’t start until 3 hours after job 2? That’s now a 14 hour day where your either working or getting ready to work with just enough “down time” to not really get too much accomplished… AND you’re going to get taxed on each paycheck. That sounds awful

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I would struggle get anything done. 3 hours is just not enough time. Sometimes it feels like 8 isn’t even enough.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh yeah it 100% is. I don’t mind though because I like being busy and of I don’t get all the work done no one faults me. Me days feel like they are 5mins long it’s great. I arrive at work get stuck in and then look at the clock and fuck its 5pm time to go home.

    • shapesandstuff@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      5 would be decent i think. If you can’t get through a “part” of a task, however you define that in your field, that should either be broken up more there are other issues

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Some meetings are BS while others are legitimately helpful - I think a 3 hr day would make those good meetings hard to squeeze in.

  • chooglers@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    you get up at 12 and start to work at 1, take an hour for lunch and then at 2 you’re done.

  • fraksken@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok. Let’s say we have 4 hour workdays, 4 day work weeks. Not just for white collar.

    A business would require to hire 2 more people to cover a 24h continuous prosuction line (3 8h shifts to 5 4h shifts).

    there would be more employment and higher productivity. More happiness I suspect.

    I’d take it.