• DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a common argument, but with 93% of people not really using cash would anyone be bothered surveilling the other 7% ?

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Should be. There are many reasons you may not want a transaction to be public knowledge, or even known by governmental bodies. Apart from the actual illegal/grey area stuff, there are things that can be deemed “suspicious” which are actually completely harmless.

        • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know that. I’m saying I don’t see the point in capturing that last few percent.

          Anyone with nefarious intent will use crypto anyway.

          • Dalinar@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Guy doesn’t want the government to know about his brothel visits.