A cargo ship with 123-foot ‘WindWing’ sails has just departed on its maiden voyage::Retrofitted with 123-foot ‘WindWings,’ ‘Pyxis Ocean’ is testing two giant sails on its six-week journey from China to Brazil.
We’ve made a full circle, haven’t we?
“Man invents sail.”
We’ll see hitching posts start making a comeback soon
I appreciate this headline referring to them directly as “sails” and not trying to dress it up as some crazy new invention.
The idea is cool, and there’s cool new tech involved. It’s a great example of how we can fight climate change by finding better ways - even updates on old ways - to solve problems (technology alone will not solve climate change but that’s a separate discussion).
But it’s hard for anyone to take it seriously when breathless tech writers insist on describing sailing as a “Pioneering new breakthrough in maritime technology” or whatever. Sometimes the playbook just doesn’t fit, and it really shows.
Oh man I remember reading articles about this kind of tech in magazines like Popular Mechanics and Popular Science ages ago on how in the future ships might use these rigid sails to save fuel. They were always portrayed as being right around the corner, even though it was clearly not the case.
Wind is finally cheaper than oil and gas. 🙃
I too remember reading about this ships already 30y ago in the German P.M. mag.
Bunker fuel (HFO) is pretty cheap, as long as you don’t care about the environment…
Japanese carrier K-Line is also experimenting with kite-like technology, interestingly also claiming about 20% of fuel consumption reduction. https://youtu.be/pPclp6fJ4BY
I’m excited to see these sails or kites in person. It just makes sense to harness that wind energy back.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/pPclp6fJ4BY
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
I would consider this like a hybrid vehicle. The sails reduce the emissions but you’re still relying heavily on bunker fuel.
The real question is how much is the retrofitting vs the cost saved through the ship’s life.
No it isn’t. That’s the late stage capitalism question. The real question is does the retrofitting offset enough nonrenewable energy usage, and I’d bet the wear and tear on a ship not designed to be powered that way will blow that savings out of the water.
Too bad we live in a late-stage capitalism world, so those sorts of questions are definitely the right ones to ask.
That is the real question indeed. But most companies think late stage capitalism vs will they still have a planet to make money after their next quarter.
There was a famous non-cargo ship that had these when I was a kid.
