My display name literally lists my pronouns as [he/him], as does my profile description.
Also you assumed that I gave a sexualised reply as a way of disparaging homosexual behaviour.
That’s what the origin of oral as an insult is, yes. Ask yourself why it’s insulting to claim someone to be sucking off a man.
Kinda male-centric, chauvinistic, and puritanical, don’t you think?
Projection. Treating sexual acts as demeaning is chauvanistic and puritanical. Why specifically use “sucking off” and not “worshipping,” or some other demeaning display of loyalty? To draw on homophobia.
Do some self-crit. I don’t believe you are intending on being homophobic, but I do believe you are relying on homophobia to insult me.
My display name literally lists my pronouns as [he/him], as does my profile description.
Didn’t read your profile description and on voyager you just show up as Cowbee@lemmy.ml.
That’s what the origin of oral as an insult is, yes. Ask yourself why it’s insulting to claim someone to be sucking off a man.
We are in the 21st century, if you were fellating a woman I’d have phrased it differently. The MLs you people tend to cite are men though, so I went with that.
Projection. Treating sexual acts as demeaning is chauvanistic and puritanical. Why specifically use “sucking off” and not “worshipping,” or some other demeaning display of loyalty? To draw on homophobia
I am personally only drawing on how much you people wanna fuck these guys.
Personally I own up to it, I’d fuck Malatesta, I’d fuck Goldman, Marx could get it if he brushed out his beard.
I’d say do some self crit yourself, maybe with a sexologist.
Edit:
After rigorous self criticism, I have decided that saying you’re sucking them off is not apt in this situation.
If we were speaking out loud it would be correct as you’d be using your mouth in an attempt to pressure these dead men.
However, as we are presumably using fingers to type out these responses, it would be better to say you’re giving them handjobs.
Please feel free to disregard this if you’re using a different input method such as text to voice, or a stylus (in which case the metaphor would be sounding, I guess).
Didn’t read your profile description and on voyager you just show up as Cowbee@lemmy.ml.
Fair enough.
We are in the 21st century, if you were fellating a woman I’d have phrased it differently. The MLs you people tend to cite are men though, so I went with that.
Using sex as a demeaning act is still chauvanistic. As for authors, I would advocate reading Rosa Luxemburg had the conversation been about Reformism vs Revolution, or Leslie Feinberg (though she used a variety of pronouns, they preferred She/Her) had the topic been about Trans Rights. Pretending only Men have contributed to Marxism is again, chauvanism.
I am personally only drawing on how much you people wanna fuck these guys.
Sigh, chauvanism again, and back to homophobia as you know I identify as male.
Personally I own up to it, I’d fuck Malatesta, I’d fuck Goldman, Marx could get it if he brushed out his beard.
Sure, you aren’t directing that as an insult towards another, but as individual expression of your own sexuality. There’s a large difference between the two.
I’d say do some self crit yourself, maybe with a sexologist.
I try to be self-critical as much as possible, otherwise I would never be able to grow.
My display name literally lists my pronouns as [he/him], as does my profile description.
That’s what the origin of oral as an insult is, yes. Ask yourself why it’s insulting to claim someone to be sucking off a man.
Projection. Treating sexual acts as demeaning is chauvanistic and puritanical. Why specifically use “sucking off” and not “worshipping,” or some other demeaning display of loyalty? To draw on homophobia.
Do some self-crit. I don’t believe you are intending on being homophobic, but I do believe you are relying on homophobia to insult me.
Didn’t read your profile description and on voyager you just show up as Cowbee@lemmy.ml.
We are in the 21st century, if you were fellating a woman I’d have phrased it differently. The MLs you people tend to cite are men though, so I went with that.
I am personally only drawing on how much you people wanna fuck these guys.
Personally I own up to it, I’d fuck Malatesta, I’d fuck Goldman, Marx could get it if he brushed out his beard.
I’d say do some self crit yourself, maybe with a sexologist.
Edit:
After rigorous self criticism, I have decided that saying you’re sucking them off is not apt in this situation.
If we were speaking out loud it would be correct as you’d be using your mouth in an attempt to pressure these dead men.
However, as we are presumably using fingers to type out these responses, it would be better to say you’re giving them handjobs.
Please feel free to disregard this if you’re using a different input method such as text to voice, or a stylus (in which case the metaphor would be sounding, I guess).
Fair enough.
Using sex as a demeaning act is still chauvanistic. As for authors, I would advocate reading Rosa Luxemburg had the conversation been about Reformism vs Revolution, or Leslie Feinberg (though she used a variety of pronouns, they preferred She/Her) had the topic been about Trans Rights. Pretending only Men have contributed to Marxism is again, chauvanism.
Sigh, chauvanism again, and back to homophobia as you know I identify as male.
Sure, you aren’t directing that as an insult towards another, but as individual expression of your own sexuality. There’s a large difference between the two.
I try to be self-critical as much as possible, otherwise I would never be able to grow.