Credibility high but this article is pretty biased.
How does a headline like this even make sense outside of just straight up throwing jabs. What is the information it wants me to know.
How do you even measure the crowd leaving early vs going for a piss. By the end they’re showing the audience doing the wave and crowd looks unchanged.
Trump sucks. But I would expect better than sharing this stuff. This is the type of rhetoric that leads to zealots hanging out on over passes yelling about pizza
maybe media outlets are starting to realize they have a vested interest in NOT having a dictatorship where all outlets are taken over and consolidated into a single state-controlled news outlet
“that’ll never happen!”
it won’t. until we become a dictatorship, and it does happen
Credibility high but this article is pretty biased.
How does a headline like this even make sense outside of just straight up throwing jabs. What is the information it wants me to know.
How do you even measure the crowd leaving early vs going for a piss. By the end they’re showing the audience doing the wave and crowd looks unchanged.
Trump sucks. But I would expect better than sharing this stuff. This is the type of rhetoric that leads to zealots hanging out on over passes yelling about pizza
“MSN” is not where the article is from though. It’s Newsweek. So, yeah. Trash.
maybe media outlets are starting to realize they have a vested interest in NOT having a dictatorship where all outlets are taken over and consolidated into a single state-controlled news outlet
“that’ll never happen!”
it won’t. until we become a dictatorship, and it does happen