Isn’t it the users that essential keep their instances alive?
“we are willing to cut users that don’t fit with what we are aiming for and think that instances sound have particular goals other then ‘growth’”
Isn’t it the users that essential keep their instances alive?
“we are willing to cut users that don’t fit with what we are aiming for and think that instances sound have particular goals other then ‘growth’”
i can understand where they’re coming from
if your instance was called lemmy.freds.com, and your goal was to create an instance purely for people called fred to use; it would be understandable to remove people who claimed to be called fred, and then it turns out they actually aren’t
now i don’t know what instance this is, but say it’s lemmy.dbzer0.com - if a user is going around decrying piracy, or reporting copyright infringement on lemmy to authorities; i think it would be reasonable to remove them
What if they are cutting you off because you are of a particular race they don’t like?
https://files.catbox.moe/n6qy9b.jpg
Being in the US doesn’t make you a white male.
Seems like you’re just trying to drum up drama, tbh
I feel like you’re being purposely vague. Is this a lemmy instance? Just link the thread.
Then you’re better off not using their instance. Forcing instances to host everyone isn’t as open-minded as you think. If lemmy is to be policed and forced-inclusion is to be implemented …. Then lemmy isn’t really free.
Racism- any “ism” for that matter, sucks, but in a social media atmosphere, provided it’s not physically hurting someone or, targeted harassment towards anyone, should be allowed- or it’s not a free society.