• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    From what I see in the archive link I posted, it only contains patches, not playable games, neither original nor patched. You need a copy of the game already to make any use of it.

    • Dremor@lemmy.world
      shield
      M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’ll take a look tomorrow. I’m UTC+2 (I just can’t sleep right now 😅), so I’m not yet in the required state of mind to go and check all of that.

    • Pixelguin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s correct. The entire archive is only about 12GB; it couldn’t possibly contain the full games.

      • Dremor@lemmy.world
        shield
        M
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You don’t need to have the full game to be considered as piracy. Anything allowing to break a DRM could be considered as such.

        Edit :

        I understand that most of you do not agree with that, and I do too, but as a mod I have to put my feelings on the matter aside and put the community and lemmy.world interest first. If we get DMCA (or the EU equivalent), consequences could be quite significant for this community or the server itself.

        You can find a more specific explanation of my stance here :

        https://lemmy.world/comment/11587381

          • Dremor@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Thank you for taking the time to share your expertise.
            In the EU, things are a bit different. US Fair Use is quite open ended, with a lot of room for interpretation. In the case of EU copyright laws, the list of exclusions is explicitly listed in Information Society Directive Article 5.
            In my opinion this could fall into either art. 5.3(d), art. 5.3(i), or art. 5.3(k), but I’m no copyright law specialist. I do have one among my friends, but she kinda got a child last week, I’m not gonna bother her for that 😅.

              • Dremor@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                First, please take into consideration that lemmy.world website and organisation is bound to EU laws (as stated in the TOS). As such, in the current case the EU copyright laws, that are as previously stated, far more restrictive than the US ones.

                As you stated, the objective of ROM patches is to modify copyrighted material. One of the right protected by copyright in the EU is the right to modify a software.

                By default, if no licence is given, software is considered as being under the most restrictive licence available (even if the source code is freely available), which means, in this case, an “all rights reserved” licence, which prohibit software modification.

                In the EU, third party patches are considered as derivative works, and requires an explicit authorisation from the copyright holder to be published and used on copyrighted material. Some exceptions exists, as previously stated, but applying them here would be quite far fetched.

                For now, and while I keep researching on the application of EU copyright laws to try to find a flaw that would allow me to authorize those links, I’ll have to keep those links removed.

                The comments would be restored if the link are removed by the comment authors.

                • hamid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  ok, thanks for your response but I am an expert in global copyright and know you are being overly cautious so I appreciate your role here but I also know you are being overly risk averse for no reason. Have fun with that, I was just trying to be informative.