Andreas Kling aka @awesomekling wrote:

We’ve been evaluating a number of C++ successor languages for @ladybirdbrowser , and the one best suited to our needs appears to be @SwiftLang 🪶

Over the last few months, I’ve asked a bunch of folks to pick some little part of our project and try rewriting it in the different languages we were evaluating. The feedback was very clear: everyone preferred Swift!

Why do we like Swift?

First off, Swift has both memory & data race safety (as of v6). It’s also a modern language with solid ergonomics.

Something that matters to us a lot is OO. Web specs & browser internals tend to be highly object-oriented, and life is easier when you can model specs closely in your code. Swift has first-class OO support, in many ways even nicer than C++.

The Swift team is also investing heavily in C++ interop, which means there’s a real path to incremental adoption, not just gigantic rewrites.

Strong ties to Apple?

Swift has historically been strongly tied to Apple and their platforms, but in the last year, there’s been a push for “swiftlang” to become more independent. (It’s now in a separate GitHub org, no longer in “apple”, for example).

Support for non-Apple platforms is also improving, as is the support for other, LSP-based development environments.

What happens next?

We aren’t able to start using it just yet, as the current release of Swift ships with a version of Clang that’s too old to grok our existing C++ codebase. But when Swift 6 comes out of beta this fall, we will begin using it!

No language is perfect, and there are a lot of things here that we don’t know yet. I’m not aware of anyone doing browser engine stuff in Swift before, so we’ll probably end up with feedback for the Swift team as well.

I’m super excited about this! We must steer Ladybird towards memory safety, and the first step is selecting a successor language that we can begin adopting very soon. 🤓🐞

  • mke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I know some folks think this is annoying, but once again, note that if you’re the kind of user who shuns Brave because the CEO does stupid shit every once in a while, you’ll probably not look fondly upon Ladybird’s project lead and main developer being scared of pronouns.

    See this issue on github.

    If you don’t care about that, it’s an interesting project. Can’t say I approve, though.

    Posting this to inform people and let each one decide what to do on their own. Don’t harass anyone, please.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      https://lemmy.ml/post/19080982/12955657

      I feel like Linus has said much worse things, without much remorse (the attacks didn’t stop after he apologized), for many many years, but I have never seen anyone boycott Linux solely because of his attitude…

      I think most people do not consider the Ladybird drama to be a big deal, it seems only a small vocal minority really care about it.

      • mke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        https://lemmy.ml/post/19080982/12955657

        What do you want me to read here? I see three comments unrelated to anything I said.

        I feel like Linus has said much worse things, without much remorse (the attacks didn’t stop after he apologized), for many many years,

        Linus had a problem with criticizing people’s work respectfully. Rather, he’d straight up insult people, with little to no useful feedback, and people very much complained about it. Maintainers complained. It got to the point that he, thankfully, committed to taking a break from the kernel to work on improving himself. It wasn’t just an apology. He has since gotten much better. When he regresses, it’s entirely fair to criticize it.

        but I have never seen anyone boycott Linux solely because of his attitude…

        Then you’ll be happy to discover that many people working on Linux were quite public about their disapproval of Linus’ behavior back then. With him, with others, it was their complaints that got him to change.

        I think most people do not consider the Ladybird drama to be a big deal, it seems only a small vocal minority really care about it.

        Maybe. But it’s not about the size of the group, it’s about the complaints themselves. We don’t decide whether something is an issue worth caring about based on how many people think so. That’d be horrible. Racism was once the issue of a vocal minority; thank goodness people didn’t shut up about it and more eventually listened.

        Andreas’ behavior reflects poorly on the project as a whole and ought to change. It pushes away folks who could be part of the community and helping the project, be it as users, developers or financial supporters. My comments aren’t intended to incentivize boycotting Ladybird because I don’t like the man, they’re meant to raise awareness of a serious issue in the hopes that, one day, perhaps he’ll grow up like Linus did.


        I’d never mention this out of the blue, but since you brought up Linus, here’s my useless fun opinion. I’d bet money that Andreas’ takes on inclusivity wouldn’t be appreciated by Linus, because the man’s one deranged step away from calling pronouns woke.

      • mke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        My idiology diverges significantly from the lemmy devs, but here we are.

        Would you be willing to elaborate on why that’s relevant here? As in, what do you mean by this?

        Because Lemmy and Ladybird are wildly different projects, tackling completely different issues, and consequently users interact with them and their developers in very different ways. To put it a little bluntly, I think that observation sounds insightful, but it’s just silly when you dig deeper. I’d rather not waste time writing entire paragraphs based on an assumption of what you meant, though.

        And I don’t know about you, but I’m keeping my eye on Sublinks. I appreciate Lemmy as a piece of software, but it doesn’t have my undying loyalty merely because I created an account on it, nor are it and its developers immune to my criticism just because I use it.

        • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m strongly opposed to the lemmy devs political and social views, yet I’m happily using the platform they developed.

          I’m not quite sure how I can be clearer?

          • mke@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            What message, exactly, or what point did you intend to communicate?

            For example, the following are possible non-exclusive interpretations to my perspective:

            • It’s possible to use Ladybird without agreeing with Andreas’ views.
            • It’s possible to use any software without agreeing with developers’ views.
            • It’s possible to use Ladybird without supporting Andreas’ views.
            • It’s possible to use any software without supporting developers’ views.
            • It’s unnecessary to bring up Andreas’ views when discussing Ladybird.
            • It’s unnecessary to bring up developers’ views when discussing any software.

            These may be similar and/or related, but are not the same, and thus I would answer them differently.

            • bombadil@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Not everyone thinks it is unnecessary or impossible to not bring up/separate Andreas’ views from the project.

            • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I don’t think I’m really making any of those points in isolation, but I think probably the first.

              It’s possible to acknowledge that I don’t agree with the views of the devs while using their software, but it does create a kind of tension that I would avoid if a viable alternative existed.

              The views of devs are relevant to my decision whether or not to use whatever software, but they’re not solely determinant.

              Similarly, I prefer open source software and will always seek it out and when comparing alternatives I heavily weight open source as an advantage. That said, I do still use some microsoft software (notably microsoft teams) for a variety of reasons.