• Lupus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I agree with all that you said.

    I think the issue you’re running into is that the point here is Walz is being subjected to ad hominem to distract from a broader discussion on the nature of genocide because such discussions are bad for Israel and their conservative benefactors in the US.

    Ah yeah that makes sense, your rephrasing made me understand the issue.

    The Holocaust is unique in a particular sense, but that is not what Walz is talking about; in the context he is speaking, the Holocaust is not unique. Essentially, the Holocaust, as a vivid and well-documented case study, can and should be a window into the broader history of genocide and human rights abuse.

    I understand, I was trying to point out that nuance is important in that instance, the uniqueness of the event is a good cautionary tale and to diminish that into a too broad of a “genocide blanket” would take away from the unique problems genocide projects into our modern world.

    Similar to how antisemitism is a form of racism but in its “design” it is still a unique form of racism.

    Although my attempt was way less eloquent than yours.

    Thank you, that was the first comment that actually engaged with what I tried to say.