• Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s only hypocrisy if they do things that disagree with their own views, and their own views are internally conistent in this case. Their view is not that all third parties are bad, their view is that third parties that have a negative impact are bad. So it doesn’t make it hypocrisy just because it disagrees with your straw man of their views.

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Their view is not that all third parties are bad, their view is that third parties that have a negative impact are bad.

      That sure isn’t the heat I was catching these last few days. It was definitely “third parties are bad!”

      • Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Under plurality voting, third parties are objectively bad for the winning chances of whatever party they pull more voters from (and/or bad for whatever major party you personally would vote for, if you personally vote third party). That might be what some people meant by them being “bad”, even though they prefer one of those major parties to win (and cheer on anything that makes the other party less likely to win). Although it’s certainly possible that some people just think they are bad in general. People do have different opinions, after all.

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          People do have different opinions, after all.

          Agreed. But people definitely were not thinking that way when they said I was a russian asset troll, just because posted some news articles about the Green Party.