“it is possible to train 8 days a week.”
– that one ai bot google made
Probably trained on this argument.
First mentioned by linus techtip.
i had fun arguing with chatgpt about this
5% of the times it works every time.
You can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. 45% of all people know that.
The T in “ninja” is silent. Silent and invisible.
You’ve discovered an artifact!! Yaaaay
If you ask GPT to do this in a more math questiony way, itll break it down and do it correctly. Just gotta narrow top_p and temperature down a bit
Chatgpt just told me there is one r in elephant.
Is this satire or
Garbage in, garbage out. Keep feeding it shit data, expect shit answers.
The people here don’t get LLMs and it shows. This is neither surprising nor a bad thing imo.
In what way is presenting factually incorrect information as if it’s true not a bad thing?
LLMs operate using tokens, not letters. This is expected behavior. A hammer sucks at controlling a computer and that’s okay. The issue is the people telling you to use a hammer to operate a computer, not the hammer’s inability to do so
Claude 3 nailed it on the first try
Maybe in a “it is not going to steal our job… yet” way.
True but if we suddenly invent an AI that can replace most jobs I think the rich have more to worry about than we do.
Maybe, but I am in my 40s and my back aches, I am not in a shape for revolution :D
Lenin was 47 in 1917
People who make fun of LLMs most often do get LLMs and try to point out how they tend to spew out factually incorrect information, which is a good thing since many many people out there do not, in fact, “get” LLMs (most are not even acquainted with the acronym, referring to the catch-all term “AI” instead) and there is no better way to make a precaution about the inaccuracy of output produced by LLMs –however realistic it might sound– than to point it out with examples with ridiculously wrong answers to simple questions.
Edit: minor rewording to clarify
There ARE two "R"s in strawberry.
There’s also a third one, but you can’t have three without having two.
That reminds me, I have 1 finger. I also have two fingers, 3 fingers and all the way up to 10 fingers!
True fact.
Using a token predictor to do sub-token analysis produces bad results?!?! Shocking Wow great content
Boy, your face is red like a strawbrerry.
I stand with chat-gpt on this. Whoever created these double letters is the idiot here.
Q: “How many r are there in strawberry?”
A: “This question is usually answered by giving a number, so here’s a number: 632. Mission complete.”
A one-digit number. Fun fact, the actual spelling gets stripped out before the model sees it, because usually it’s not important.
It can also help you with medical advice.
Many intelligences are saying it! I’m just telling it like it is.
To be fair, I knew a lot of people who struggled with word problems in math class.