• barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Both phone calls and emails are so full of ad-ridden garbage that they are useless for communication.

    Texts are better signal-to-noise ratio, for me it is more like only 1% con artist identity thieves compared to the 99% coming via phone call.

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t know if phone call spam is only an American thing or something. In my country (and most of Europe) that stuff is effectively banned and doesn’t really happen.

      Still hate getting calls though.

      • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        having proper bans in place do help, cutting number spoofing and rooting out local spam sources + barring voips that facilitate them means spam callers would have to connect internationally and cost more.

        • JordanZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          FCC is working on getting STIR/SHAKEN in place but it’s slow.

          It’s basically the security you see with certs and domain names on the web but with phone numbers. If you try to place a call and can’t provide the ‘proof’ you own the number then the phone carrier just kills the call. Also helps with traceability because now they know exactly who owns what numbers so complaints of spam are much easier to go after.

          You can already see this in inbound calls in your phone app. Should have a little check mark for validated callers.

          Edit: freaking autocorrect