Was there an alternative adjective to “clockwise” other than “the rotation you take around left hand”?

Also, how did all watch companies around the world agree on what the direction of “clockwise” is?

  • OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    A guy I know owns this clock, which basically proves that everything in life is pointless and arbitrary:

    • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also why the seemingly arbitrary graduations, 24 hours, 60 minutes, 60 seconds. If it was say 10 hours in a day, 100 minutes in an hour, 100 seconds in a minute, seconds would be close to the same amount of time. Same with latitude and longitude, why 360 degrees in a circle with 60 minutes in a degree and 60 seconds in a minute.

      • superkret@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s all based on 12, which is nice cause it’s divisible by 2, 3, 4 and 6.
        A system based on 10 gives you issues if you want to divide the year into 4 seasons, the day into morning, midday, evening and night, the compass into cardinal directions, etc…

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The short explanation is that those numbers are more easily divided by a larger set of denominators. 24 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12. 100 is divisble by 2, 5, 10, 25, and 50. 60 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, and 30.

        Metric is great for scaling up and down ad infinitum, but it sucks for fractions. Fractions are easier for daily use without precision measuring equipment.

      • Harrison [He/Him]@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The units of time we use come from a bronze age civilisation that used base twelve instead of base ten. They’d count on their hands using the finger joints of one for single digits, and then the joints of the other for multiples.

      • FunkFactory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Other commenters hit on the reasoning, just adding that they’re called highly composite numbers. My favorite!

    • EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have one of these, it was a gag gift from a friend. I’ve had it up so long now though I have to double check which clock in looking at before I tell the time because I’ve got so used to it

      • OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s actually the only non-arbitrary thing in existence. If the alphabet wasn’t in alphabetical order, we’d all be dead right now.