In her first interview as the Democratic presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris told CNN it was imperative to reach a ceasefire deal in Gaza, but made it clear that she would not alter President Joe Biden’s policy in the region.

However, when pressed on whether she would stop sending weapons to Israel she told Bash, “No, we have to get a deal done, Dana. We have to get a deal done.”

“Adopting an arms embargo against Israel’s assault on Gaza is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic move to defeat Trump and MAGA extremism. It is difficult for the Democratic candidate to champion democracy while arming Netanyahu’s authoritarian regime” reads a recent letter to Harris from the coalition Not Another Bomb.

Recent polling has repeatedly demonstrated that Democratic voters overwhelmingly support the conditioning of U.S. military aid. A Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) survey from March found that 52% of Americans want the U.S. to halt weapons shipments to Israel in order to force a ceasefire. 62% of Biden voters said “The US should stop weapons shipments to Israel until Israel discontinues its attacks on the people of Gaza,” while only 14% disagreed with the statement.

The numbers from a June CBS News poll were even higher, with more than 60% of all voters and almost 80% of Democrats saying the U.S. shouldn’t send Israel weapons.

“The real question should have been, ‘When are you going to start enforcing U.S. law as it relates to arms shipments’ because what we are doing right now, with this United States policy, is in violation of not just international law, but also of American law, “said the Arab Center’s Yousef Munayyer in an interview with Democracy Now in response to the CNN segment. “Vice-President Harris made it clear in other parts of her interview that she wants to be a prosecutor. She wants to enforce the law, but Israel is clearly getting an exception from the Harris campaign.”

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    It’s not like she has a choice. The defense contractors call all the shots and they want to keep the arms flowing. We vote for the promise of maybe getting a small piece of that pie to fund healthcare for the elderly, maybe, they’ll increase military spending anyways.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    God they’re so stupid.

    Israel will not stop until we take away their ability to continue.

    When this war ends, Netanyahu will be removed from power for his prior crimes and likely jailed. He doesn’t want that and he’s murdering Palestinians to be sure he never sees the inside of a cell.

    I wish we had an actual viable option for ending this war. But my choices right now are vote for the genocide or flee the country because Trump has promised he will make my wife’s life hell day one.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    As much as I hate to admit this, I don’t think this will change my opinion on her. Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s incredibly fucked up that they continue to give them the weapons they use to murder civilians. But I also know that pretty much every president that has been elected since Israel has existed as a country would do exactly the same. The vast majority of politicians are spineless when it comes to Israel and always will be, regardless of party affiliation. No matter who gets elected it will always be the same answer with varying degrees of severity. And even if Harris wanted to do something about it, do you really think she would say anything new until she knew for a fact she was going to win? She’d get ostracized by the majority of her own party and potentially lose a bunch of those fancy endorsements she just received.

    I’m not saying it’s right. In fact, it’s so fucked up it makes my blood boil. I’m just saying that politicians are fucking cowards and always will be.

    • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      But I also know that pretty much every president that has been elected since Israel has existed as a country would do exactly the same.

      Your knowledge is incorrect. Please seek out better sources.

      Reagan said Israel is carrying out a holocaust, and stopped them with a single phonecall. Bush Sr. stopped them by threatening arms embargo as well. Eisenhower and Ford couldn’t stomach their bloodlust either and called them off.

      Israel is a client state of the US empire, it’s best to think of it as the 51st state. They do what they’re told.

      • Saff@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        What does trump say? Ultimately that’s the only person you need to compare Harris to.

        • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Pretty similar, promising to negotiate a deal to end the slaughter asap. But there’s no reason to believe any candidate wants to end the genocide.

          If you’re an American who pays for the killing, you should act in solidarity with the victims and their relatives. There should be an #uncommitted group in your state, see what they recommend.

          • Saff@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            So I’m not American, I don’t have a say in this election, but what the fuck do you mean “who pays for the killing”? Get the fuck out of here with this guilt tripping bull shit. The common man doesn’t have enough power to raise their wage by dollar, you think they actually have a say in who their government sends weapons to? Honestly, nobody (of the common people) wants this shit, but other than voting what do you expect them to do? Sure they could vote for trump instead of Harris but as you say they have a similar stance on this topic. So if there is not difference in this topic, they need to vote based on other important topics. The whole “don’t vote for anyone” tactic is fucking stupid and at this point I’m 99% convinced are propaganda bots trying to reduce the Dems votes. I suspect either funded by Russia to cause instability within the US or by parasitic corporations worried the democrats will reduce their profits slightly.

            • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              17 days ago

              The average American has far more power over the genocide than most everyone else in the world, including Palestinians. Any act of resistance an American makes is amplified.

              • Saff@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 days ago

                My point is though they only have two options, and both of those options are happy to continue funding war crimes. They are stuck between a rock and a hard place. Yet people on this platform like to make out that generic mr smith underpaid mechanic in the middle of the US is directly causing children to be murdered. Protesting is the only option but let’s be honest, that just gets ignored. So instead of these relentless posts about Harris continuing funding, why not try to focus on topics where the 2 parties differ to give the people an idea about which party might be best for them in other ways?

                • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  As you said, protest is the only option. One form of protesting is not voting, or voting third party.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          all it takes is one phone call from a US Pres

          What an amazingly simplistic view of geopolitics.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Israel is a nuclear client state. One overzealous president is all it takes to launch a nuke at Pakistan and cause a global calamity.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Why?

    Seriously! Why!?

    I don’t remotely understand this policy, and it seems that pretty much noone would vote for it if they could avoid doing so.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        US was saying this over and over and it is finally doing it, which is getting out of Middle East and letting them on their own. This is why there’s also so hard push for EVs.

        The policy is to allow selling weapons, not to give them, it is also not what Bibi hopes that US will enter another war and fight on his behalf.

        • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Trying to claim that the US is trying to get out of the Middle East is both infantile and asinine. As long as there’s natural resources to be stolen, the US will be there. If there was such a fight for EV’s, the US wouldn’t be blocking Chinese EV’s from entering the market.

          • takeda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            If there was such a fight for EV’s, the US wouldn’t be blocking Chinese EV’s from entering the market.

            So it would switch from being dependent on Saudi Arabia to China?

            • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              If China made a superior product at a good price, yes, I would buy Chinese.

                • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  China doesn’t need to kill off western manufacturers, the West did that. Capitalism has turned the US from a predominantly manufacturing country to a predominant customer service country.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Actually this is the opposite. Israel wants US involved and start another war on their behalf. US is pissed and saying what it was saying for a while, that it is getting out of Middle East. If Israel wants to fight a war, US won’t block them from purchasing weapons, but they are on their own.

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Her husband also made a pledge to, “fight antisemitism” when asked about Israel’s crimes.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Israel is the country equivalent of the US sending an aircraft carrier outside a country it has tenuous relations with yet wants favorable trade. It’s how they cement the Petro-Dollar as the global currency and dominate financial capital.

      Ceasing support for Israel risks hurting US profits, so the US has a monetary interest in propping up the genocidal campaign while pretending to push for a ceasefire to appease domestic tensions, however poorly.

          • Keeponstalin@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            That page literally doesn’t reference likely voters at all. Do you just somehow think all Jewish people are a monolith? There are plenty of Jewish people against the genocide

            We know for a fact that there are hundreds of thousands of likely voters in each swing state that would enthusiasticly vote for Harris if she changed position on Israel

            • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 days ago

              Jews have statistical higher voter turnout than other groups. They’re overwhelmingly Democrats. Many have bought into the Israel criticism = antisemitism. Israel has a lot of influence and can easily help the Republicans win. There are rich Jews who donate to the Democrats. The Democrats also have down ballot races to worry about.

              https://library.fiveable.me/sociology-of-religion/unit-6/religious-voting-behavior/study-guide/CsjUqX3QciF9nQc3

              • Keeponstalin@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 days ago

                You get that’s general findings from a global poll right? When you look at US polling on the issue, it’s pretty clear

                Recent polling has repeatedly demonstrated that Democratic voters overwhelmingly support the conditioning of U.S. military aid. A Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) survey from March found that 52% of Americans want the U.S. to halt weapons shipments to Israel in order to force a ceasefire. 62% of Biden voters said “The US should stop weapons shipments to Israel until Israel discontinues its attacks on the people of Gaza,” while only 14% disagreed with the statement.

                The numbers from a June CBS News poll were even higher, with more than 60% of all voters and almost 80% of Democrats saying the U.S. shouldn’t send Israel weapons.

                In case you ignored the polls from the article. Here’s another:

                An April 2024 poll of likely voters across the U.S. found that 30% strongly supported withholding military funds to Israel until the attacks on Gaza stop; another 25% somewhat supported that conditional aid policy.

                Below we asked all respondents what minimum combination of policies would secure (for non-Biden voters) or solidify (for Biden voters) a vote for Biden for President. A third or more voters in every state except Minnesota said a lasting ceasefire was among the minimum policies that would be needed to secure solidify their votes

                Although voters are split on whether they approve or disapprove of Biden’s handling of the war, the vast majority (≥ ~75%) across all states still support an immediate and permanent ceasefire. Only a small minority of voters, from 11.2% to 16.1% in Minnesota and Pennsylvania, respectively, strongly approve of the President’s approach on Gaza. Of those, the vast majority in each state (≥64%) strongly support an immediate and permanent ceasefire. That is to say, a change in approach would not lose those votes, but staying on the current path risks doing so.

      • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        You’re drawing some pretty premature conclusions from incomplete information. No, I’m against genocide too. But there are some in this thread who would pretend Harris is more pro-genocide than Trump, which is demonstrably false.

        • whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          i mean there aren’t any pro-fascism comments here at time of me posting this so maybe this thread isn’t the resource you think it is

          nobody in this thread is pretending harris is more pro-genocide than trump

          i have literally never seen a comment on the fediverse that implied that

          • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            It is possible you already have them blocked.

            Do you see the comment about Harris being a worse candidate than Hillary? No sane adult would say such a thing except as deliberate anti-democratic propaganda.

            • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 days ago

              No sane adult would say such a thing except as deliberate anti-democratic propaganda.

              Jesus christ, sit down child. Your political opponents are not all paid shills out to destroy your wonderfully important institutions because they are opportunistic nihilists.

              • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                18 days ago

                Because the intent of the sentiment is to get people to not vote for her, which would increase the likelihood of a Trump presidency, which would ultimately result in more genocide.

            • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 days ago

              Why don’t you respond directly to the comment that you have a problem with so that there isn’t any confusion?

        • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          But there are some in this thread who would pretend Harris is more pro-genocide than Trump, which is demonstrably false.

          Is it? She’s the one who is the VP of the organization funding the genocide. I don’t recall Trump directly funding genocide, even going out of his way to circumvent US law. Maybe he did, wouldn’t put it past him, but given the information I have at least, Kamala and Joe Biden are demonstrably, empirically more pro-genocide than Trump, who remember, has already been president in the past.

          Literally the entire political analysis of liberals on this issue is based on nothing but vibes. Trump is worse than Biden/Kamla on genocide because he has more bad guy molecules in his brain of some dumb shit.

  • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    The AIPAC queen can’t get enough of headless toddlers and rape squads

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      At least during this period of anger we won’t have to also deal with the gnawing realization that they’re 100% going to lose. Harris may still lose, and this could certainly help her along the way, but it’s not a certainty, which is kind of better?

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Checkout Trump’s history of making his “close personal friend” Bibi happy if you want to be even more angry.

      • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Many people (like myself) are simply incapable of getting any more angry at Trump.

        They know he’s an irredeemable monster and not the standard politicians should be held to.

        It’s when other “reasonable” politicians fail to seperate themselves from him or clear that bar and normalize his ideas/policies that we continue to get upset.