• Moe@forum.moe.onl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    App Store guidelines are too strict for developers, I think it will be better for mobile developer to develop their app for android ecosystem, not ios

    • mholiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      The problem with doing android dev work is that android users simply refuse to pay for useful apps. iOS users on the other hand are more open to it.

      As a developer it makes sense to prioritize iOS if you like money.

      • bokster@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        That sounds like anecdotal evidence. Android is more popular in more than half of the world and a lot of apps are successful and generate income on both platforms.

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          If you look at developer experience it’s absolutely is true. Android users just prefer free/ad supported/pirated software. If you’re an android user look at your own habits. What android applications have you purchased?

          You can search for statistics from any source online and you’ll get the same results. But in the end if you code for iOS you need to test and debug for fewer devices and you will make more money overall. There are wayyyy more android users but 70% of all mobile app spend is on iOS. Deving for iOS just makes sense if you like money.

          https://backlinko.com/iphone-vs-android-statistics#iphone-vs-android-app-spending

          • bokster@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            None of this account for differences in purchasing power and phone price.

            If you have an $150 Android device, I would of course expect you to spend way less on software than somebody with a $1500 iPhone.

            I’m not saying ‘develop for Android only’ but if your business relies on one ecosystem only, you’re at a higher risk and you’re leaving money on the table.

            • mholiv@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              You are 100% right.

              If you dev for only one you will be leaving money on the table. But for small / solo devs I can 100% see why focusing on iOS and those high paying customers makes sense if all you care about is money.

              Then once you have a customer base then you build out an android team/app.

              I’m not saying it should be this way. I’m just saying I understand why it is this way.

            • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              an $150

              a $1500

              How do you pronounce these? An 'undred and fifty? I’m honestly curious, because I can’t feel like an fits on either. I wasn’t going to care enough to ask but then you put a on one thousand five hundred.

        • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Nope, not anecdotal. It’s actual industry fact.

          The phone you use combined with the country you’re in is a very good indicator on how likely you are to spend money in an app.

        • Balder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s not, iOS has something like almost 70% of the mobile apps income despite having 1/3 or users compared to Android.

          Also Android has this annoying problem where there pirate versions of an app will show up when it has in-app purchases or scammers will rip-off your app, rebrand it and place an overwhelming amount of ads to make a quick buck before the app is flagged and taken down. That’s not accounting for the stories of accounts simply being taken down without warning.

      • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why pay for apps when you can just sideload pirated version from dubious origin and pay with your privacy and crypto mine for the pirate distributing it?

        Oh, wait, I just said the quiet part alt store advocates doesn’t want to say out loud.

        ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          why pay money for something when there exists an open source app that does the same thing (it hasn’t been updated in years)

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Android ecosystem is not so much better.

      I’ve been a supporter of web apps. Unfortunately it cuts into app store profits so it’s often shit on.

    • bokster@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, they have limited themselves to single point of failure.

      That’s like selling only blue shoelaces and then crying faul when your only supplier stops making blue color.

      If your livelihood depends on one account only, you are in great risk anyhow.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Don’t be a scam” is the guideline being broken here.

      And the consistent quality and UX expectations are a part of why iOS developers make a lot more money.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        App Store is full of scams and predatory apps. And holy shit rofl at the “consistent quality.” Steve’s been dead for over a decade and his vision of iOS has been dead for longer.

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not compared to android it isn’t.

          The floor is far, far higher on iOS than android and the experience is much more consistent, and that’s why I and many others buy iPhones.

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            It’s genuinely not. App Store review is fully automated and chock full of holes. Anyone telling you there is less malware per capita on the App Store than the Play Store is either a decade behind on their talking points or lying to you. I use Apple for mobile and tablet needs because they offer good hardware with a seamless platform experience, not because installing random garbage on their storefronts is safer – it’s not.

            EDIT: I should add the only storefront I have complete faith in is F-Droid.

            • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              We’re not talking 5/10 vs 5.5/10. The play store is 2/10 and the App Store is 7 or 8. It’s not even vaguely ambiguous. The quality is not remotely comparable.