OnlyFans billboards ruled 'not overtly sexual' by UK ad watchdog
www.euronews.com
Eliza Rose Watson's OnlyFans billboards have been cleared. "If a gambling or alcohol company can run their ads, which have far more devastating impacts, why not me?"
  • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zipEnglish
    12·
    1 year ago

    to be clear i mean inherent value as a human. Men’s inherent value isn’t questioned, so i didn’t mention it. I can see how you would think that how i meant it, and I’ll see about editing the comment so it doesn’t read that way.

    • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.eeEnglish
      6·
      1 year ago

      She’s advertising her ability to titillate, not her personality or intrinsic value and self-worth. Even with your edit, you’re still equating the persona she adopts for her business with her value as a person.

      • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zipEnglish
        0·
        1 year ago

        The ability to titillate IS an intrinsic value, a human one at that. You’re probably just sour that you don’t feel you have that ability, so you want to deny the existence and power of the ability to titilate on a human value basis.

        • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.eeEnglish
          0·
          1 year ago

          Projecting much?

          I don’t have any personal desire to do any sex work. But women who are less conventionally attractive or who don’t feel confident on camera are not any less valuable than those who do. You’re equating a woman’s value as a human to her sex appeal and that’s disgusting.

          • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zipEnglish
            11·
            1 year ago

            You don’t need to do sex work to be a human and appreciate the human experience of being titilated or titillating someone else. It’s a wonderful part of the human experience.

            You keep insisting that you know what I’m talking about, for whatever fucking reason, and you’re consistently wrong. Why are you like this?

            Stop putting your words in my mouth, they taste like shit