Incase it doesn’t show up:

    • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah JavaScript is a bit weird, semicolons being optional and compulsory at the same time: I remember trying to build an electron example ~5yrs ago and it didn’t work unless I put in the semicolons which the developers omitted.

      Python is just glorified shell scripting. Libraries like numpy are cool but I don’t like the indentation crap, I’m getting used to it because University likes it.

      • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Python is just glorified shell scripting

        Absolutely not, python is an actual programming language with sane error handling and arbitrarily nestable data structures.

        I don’t like the indentation crap

        Don’t be so superficial. When learning something, go with the flow and try to work with the design choices, not against them.

        Python simply writes a bit differently: you do e.g. more function definitions and list comprehensions.

    • void_star@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Python has its quirks, but it’s much much cleaner than js or c++, not fair to drag it down with them imo

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The terse indexing and index manipulation gets a bit Perl-ish and write-only to me. But other than that I agree.

      • tunetardis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think the thing with C++ is they have tried to maintain backward compatibility from Day 1. You can take a C++ program from the 80s (or heck, even a straight up C program), and there’s a good chance it will compile as-is, which is rather astonishing considering modern C++ feels like a different language.

        But I think this is what leads to a lot of the complexity as it stands? By contrast, I started Python in the Python 2 era, and when they switched to 3, I was like “Wow, did they just break hello world?” It’s a different philosophy and has its trade-offs. By reinventing itself, it can get rid of the legacy cruft that never worked well or required hacky workarounds, but old code will not simply run under the new interpreter. You have to hope your migration tools are up to the task.

          • tunetardis@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            There were breaking changes between C and C++ (and some divergent evolution since the initial split) as well as breaking changes between different releases of C++ itself. I am not saying these never happened, but the powers that be controlling the standard have worked hard to minimize these for better or worse.

            If I took one of my earliest ANSI C programs from the 80s and ran it through a C++23 compiler, I would probably need to remove a bunch of register statements and maybe check if an assumption of 16-bit int is going to land me in some trouble, but otherwise, I think it would build as long as it’s not linking in any 3rd party libraries.