renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 27 days agoAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 27 days agomessage-square125fedilink
minus-squareracemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·26 days agoThere are people who find XML hard to read?
minus-squareCompostMaterial@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-226 days agoDepends on how complex it is. Ever see the XML behind SharePoint? 🤮
minus-squareracemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·26 days agoBut is that the fault of XML, or is the data itself just complex, or did they structure the data badly? Would another human readable format make the data easier to read?
minus-squareactually@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·26 days agoOver time I have matured as a programmer and realize xml is very good to use sometimes, even superior. But I still want layers between me and it. I do output as yaml when I have to see what’s in there
minus-squarechunkystyles@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·25 days agoI see you’ve never worked with SOAP services that have half a dozen or more namespaces.
There are people who find XML hard to read?
Depends on how complex it is. Ever see the XML behind SharePoint? 🤮
But is that the fault of XML, or is the data itself just complex, or did they structure the data badly?
Would another human readable format make the data easier to read?
Over time I have matured as a programmer and realize xml is very good to use sometimes, even superior. But I still want layers between me and it. I do output as yaml when I have to see what’s in there
I see you’ve never worked with SOAP services that have half a dozen or more namespaces.